01 Jun '13 00:39>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
Originally posted by RJHindsOnly beyond YOUR distorted belief. If we built a time machine and went back when there were only dinosaurs on Earth, you would deny deny deny, perhaps saying we didn't go to Earth's past, we went to another planet entirely.
I spoke too soon. They were a little more conservative than they usually are. Normally, I would expect a declaration of 50,000 or more. Still how they could think it is even 10,000 years old is beyond belief.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseIt is clear dinosaurs lived with humans.
Only beyond YOUR distorted belief. If we built a time machine and went back when there were only dinosaurs on Earth, you would deny deny deny, perhaps saying we didn't go to Earth's past, we went to another planet entirely.
Originally posted by RJHindsMore creationist claptrap. You can find human footprints inside dino's but that doesn't prove they happened at the same time. A dino walking around 70 million years ago leaving a print that gets fossilized and buried and then some kind of erosion happens and the footprint is later exposed and then humans walk on the same ground and their footprints get imprinted on top of the dino's is not even CLOSE to proof they existed together.
It is clear dinosaurs lived with humans.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6GiNQvugn0
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseNonsense! The footprint was inside the dino foot print and then fossilized. A fossilized footprint can't get eroded so another footprint can't be impressed in it like that. You are talking bullcrap.
More creationist claptrap. You can find human footprints inside dino's but that doesn't prove they happened at the same time. A dino walking around 70 million years ago leaving a print that gets fossilized and buried and then some kind of erosion happens and the footprint is later exposed and then humans walk on the same ground and their footprints get impr , we know EXACTLY where you and your creationist buddies are going with all this obfuscation.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat in the pea brained hell makes you think a fossilized footprint can't get eroded? That's what happens when a 70 million year old footprint gets exposed to the top layer of soil through several processes like mountain building, folding of the crust due to continents crashing into one another and so forth and when it gets to the surface, normal erosion takes place. What do you think that fossil is anyway? Stainless steel? It's frigging ROCK and rock gets eroded all the time. You might think Grand Canyon? Krist you are dense sometimes.
Nonsense! The footprint was inside the dino foot print and then fossilized. A fossilized footprint can't get eroded so another footprint can't be impressed in it like that. You are talking bullcrap.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseIt is not going get eroded so that a person could come along millions of years later and step on it and a new fossilized footprint within a dinosaur footprint appears in its place, numbnuts.
What in the pea brained hell makes you think a fossilized footprint can't get eroded? That's what happens when a 70 million year old footprint gets exposed to the top layer of soil through several processes like mountain building, folding of the crust due to continents crashing into one another and so forth and when it gets to the surface, normal erosion ta ...[text shortened]... rock gets eroded all the time. You might think Grand Canyon? Krist you are dense sometimes.
Originally posted by RJHindsWoolly mammoths are not dinosaurs, they are related to elephants and died out as late as 4000 years ago in some places.
I see they decided to leave out any declaration of age of the woolly mammoth in this case. A wise decision indeed.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindssilly man; denying that some rock can be eroded.
It is not going get eroded so that a person could come along millions of years later and step on it and a new fossilized footprint within a dinosaur footprint appears in its place, numbnuts.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsYou can deny deny deny but that won't put humans petting dinosaurs. That is the absolute most stupid concept outside of creationism itself. You want to distort the real world to fit into the twisted timescape of imaginary creationist bullshyte.
I am not denying rocks can be eroded at all. I am denying it can happen in the way sunhouse says.
The Instructor