19 Jun 14
2 edits
Posted in Thread 159672, "How does the universes expand?", page 5:
Originally posted by RJHinds
Okay, I'll make a deal with you. If you will stop trolling my threads I will stay out of the Science Forum.
Originally posted by FabianFnas
That's a deal.
...meaning that, if RJHinds will keep his christian promise, we will not ever see him here in the Science forum any more.
19 Jun 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasHe will probably, however, feel the need to comment if you keep starting threads about him.
Posted in Thread 159672, "How does the universes expand?", page 5:
Originally posted by RJHinds
[b]Okay, I'll make a deal with you. If you will stop trolling my threads I will stay out of the Science Forum.
Originally posted by FabianFnas
That's a deal.
...meaning that, if RJHinds will keep his christian promise, we will not ever see him here in the Science forum any more.[/b]
19 Jun 14
1 edit
Originally posted by sonhouseNo no, of course I was referring to RBhill's thread! 🙂 Why would I tell everyone not to respond to FabianFnas thread and with such force? -that seems like a bit harsh and unwarranted.
That one was RBhill. Unless you are implying they are one and the same person.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
20 Jun 14
Originally posted by humyI still don't think you've spotted that RBhill is not RJHinds...
No no, of course I was referring to RBhill's thread! 🙂 Why would I tell everyone not to respond to FabianFnas thread and with such force? -that seems like a bit harsh and unwarranted.
Because on the face of it your post doesn't make sense.
FabianFnas makes a post about RJHinds.
You then tell everyone not to respond to 'him' [contextually meaning RJHinds]
and name a thread posted by RBHill.
Sonhouse, reading the conversation presumably the same way I did, asks
if you realise that the new thread is by RBHill and you then talk about
FabianFnas.....
20 Jun 14
Originally posted by googlefudgeYou really not picking up on the humor in his reply? I thought he made a pretty good recovery.
I still don't think you've spotted that RBhill is not RJHinds...
Because on the face of it your post doesn't make sense.
FabianFnas makes a post about RJHinds.
You then tell everyone not to respond to 'him' [contextually meaning RJHinds]
and name a thread posted by RBHill.
Sonhouse, reading the conversation presumably the same way I did, asks
if you realise that the new thread is by RBHill and you then talk about
FabianFnas.....
20 Jun 14
7 edits
Originally posted by forkedknightI am glad someone got it! It is a pity sonhouse didn't misspell it as something totally ludicrous like "RJHindssssssssssssssssss😛😛😛😛😕😕😕" so, with an apparently totally serious face, I could just keep repeating "RJHindssssssssssssssssss😛😛😛😛😕😕😕" in all my posts exactly just AS IF I didn't notice anything wrong!
You really not picking up on the humor in his reply? I thought he made a pretty good recovery.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
20 Jun 14
Originally posted by forkedknightNope. Didn't detect the humour.
You really not picking up on the humor in his reply? I thought he made a pretty good recovery.
If you want humour to be detected on an internet forum you need a big honking neon flashing sign that says "This post is funny".
Otherwise it will be taken literally.
20 Jun 14
Originally posted by googlefudgehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue-in-cheek
Nope. Didn't detect the humour.
If you want humour to be detected on an internet forum you need a big honking neon flashing sign that says "This post is funny".
Otherwise it will be taken literally.