24 Nov '20 01:04>1 edit
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI honestly do not understand your complaint against us in the slightest.
The post that was quoted here has been removed
One should not just cherry-pick the many good uses to which science has been putwhich one of us here has ever said "Bravo for science!" while denying science has sometimes been used for evil?
and say 'Bravo for science!' while ignoring the bad uses to which science has
been put
and say 'But that does not count because it's not really science".If something isn't science then science cannot be blamed for it.
My point is that a scientist can do both good work and bad work.Which, given nobody here denies a scientist can do bad, isn't a point.
A scientist could discover a cure for a disease and also, using a 'scientific method',No, he cannot. Not with any valid scientific method. The word 'superior', at least in this narrow context, has no scientific meaning, let alone rep something that scientific method can be applied to.
conclude that white people are intrinsically superior to non-white people
The post that was quoted here has been removedI haven't noticed any of that here but, even if I had, that's not the same thing as 'scientific racism'.
Humy prefers to attack the strawman of it being a literal quote.No, I prefer that you clarify what the hell you are talking about because I'm not a mind reader.
The 'scientific racists' said that they applied the 'scientific method' as much to questions of 'race' as they did in their other scientific work.We are not those 'scientific racists'. I for one have seen no evidence that any of us here are these 'scientific racists'. Perhaps you would like to explain yourself, making apparent unfounded and unprovoked accusations against us? And why this apparent prejudice against scientists and science?