13 Apr 22
@shallow-blue saidWhat a contribution.....moron!
No. Just no.
An ape can say no with hand signals. So impressive.
13 Apr 22
@wildgrass saidSo what? Either would be a significant discovery.
I think the point is that a black hole isn't a planet. Certainly would be newsworthy if one were found in our solar system, but let's use the correct terms.
You don't even know primordial black holes exist. They are purely theoretical.
I did use the correct terms. Your disagreeing which is causing the gravitational influence doesn't change that. Stop falsely claiming I used a wrong term when I did nothing of the sort.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 4765
14 Apr 22
@wildgrass saidThis article supports 1 and 3 of your points. It also explains why you may be mistaken about point 2.
1) Hubble appears to be the wrong tool for the job here.
2) If there was a planet in our solar system 10X larger than earth, we would have found it by now.
3) The alternative explanation (a tiny black hole the size of an orange) seems more likely to me.
Still, good stuff!
https://www.inverse.com/science/planet-9-location-orbit-distance-name-black-hole-news
@liljo saidThat article says the James Webb Space Telescope might help in the future, but does not mention the Hubble space telescope. If that is because Hubble is not suitable for the task the article does not explain why.
This article supports 1 and 3 of your points. It also explains why you may be mistaken about point 2.
Still, good stuff!
https://www.inverse.com/science/planet-9-location-orbit-distance-name-black-hole-news
I don't think the article supports his point #1. It certainly doesn't say that, but perhaps implies it by omission. That is all. It doesn't even support #3. It could be a planet that is simply too far away to see yet. The article says planet X is about 20 times further from the Sun than Neptune and Neptune was found the same way, by some significant, unseen source of gravity seemed to be affecting Uranus’ orbit before they saw it.
15 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidMore so when the actual answer is no.
What a contribution.....moron!
An ape can say no with hand signals. So impressive.
15 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidI'm not the one that is confused, Peewee.
Of course it is dark matter. You cannot see it can you? Duh!
Let me guess, you thought dark matter was special kind of matter unlike regular matter. Right? Why do you think that? Has anybody ever claimed that? Nope.
Are you confusing dark matter with dark energy? They are not the same thing. Dark energy is purely theoretical and has never been proven to exist. We already know what dark matter is. It is matter you cannot see.
Do you get your astronomy info from Global Research? Or George Noory?
15 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidThis is why 5-year-olds don't go to Harvard.
A black hole is dark matter. Rogue planets too, unless you can see them.
If it is matter and it is too dark to see it is dark matter.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2020/10/rogue-planets-milky-way/616897/
15 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidCan I ask you what your major was, and do you even have a degree?
Why is Hubble the wrong tool for the job?
"If there was a planet in our solar system 10X larger than earth, we would have found it by now"
I could say the same thing about primordial black holes, but you admit something is there causing gravitational influence. Isn't that news worthy? That could explain dark matter keeping the galaxy spinning faster than seems poss ...[text shortened]... alter the earth's orbit around the sun causing the cyclical ice ages? You opened this can of worms.
If you do, it must be in Literature, because you absolutely love making s--- up.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12472
@metal-brain saidNo, you did not, but I have not the time to explain how you are wrong forty times in a row because you refuse to accept you could be.
I did use the correct terms.
15 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidYes, that IS what I asked you, Mr. Evasion.
Can I ask you what your major was, and do you even have a degree?
15 Apr 22
@metal-brain saidTell us again what dark matter is, genius.
No.
Let's see if you get it right this time.
- Joined
- 28 Feb 16
- Moves
- 4765
15 Apr 22
Some very recent Hubble discoveries:
This article is about the biggest comet nucleus ever found.
https://hubblesite.org/contents/news-releases/2022/news-2022-020
This article sheds more light (pardon the pun) on supermassive black holes:
https://hubblesite.org/contents/news-releases/2022/news-2022-019
Sorry to interrupt the mud-slinging, name calling, science fiction vs science argument, etc. Enjoy.
16 Apr 22
@shallow-blue saidProve it, liar.
No, you did not, but I have not the time to explain how you are wrong forty times in a row because you refuse to accept you could be.