cyclodextrine-based MOF's for carbon Capture

@metal-brain said
Polar bears are doing better than ever. Antarctica has plenty of ice.

Hey, stupid...

Do you know what "antarctic" means?

@Suzianne
Maybe he misspelled ANTI Arctica? Thinking that would be the north pole area? 🙂
I mean there are SO many bears down in Antarctica for sure....

@suzianne said
Hey, stupid...

Do you know what "antarctic" means?

Post my entire quote instead of taking it out of context.
I know the difference between the arctic and antarctic.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
There is a LOT of data and I provided it, the fact you cannot read is not my problem.

Give me the average temp increase in the last decade. Then explain why that would cause forest fires to be worse. How is a temp increase that you cannot even notice cause forest fires to be worse?

I already know the rise in temps is negligible. That is why you don't want to post it, because you would have to admit it is such a puny amount if you did.

@Metal-Brain
I gather you didn't bother to look at the NASA sight I showed, the observatory showing a net gain of CO2 in the Amazon where before it was a net sink of CO2 and the reason for that is massive land clearing by fire and the smoke seen by the scope goes all the way to Africa, but your mind is too small, too interested in proving everyone wrong using fringe sites to see what is really happening in the world.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
I gather you didn't bother to look at the NASA sight I showed, the observatory showing a net gain of CO2 in the Amazon where before it was a net sink of CO2 and the reason for that is massive land clearing by fire and the smoke seen by the scope goes all the way to Africa, but your mind is too small, too interested in proving everyone wrong using fringe sites to see what is really happening in the world.

Give me the average temp increase in the last decade. Then explain why that would cause forest fires to be worse. How is a temp increase that you cannot even notice cause forest fires to be worse?

@Metal-Brain
Find it yourself, I am not your librarian, the numbers are out there but you won't believe them anyway so go back to your OTHER pet conspiracy nonsense.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Find it yourself, I am not your librarian, the numbers are out there but you won't believe them anyway so go back to your OTHER pet conspiracy nonsense.

You are too embarrassed to admit that number and now everybody on here knows it.

Explain why that would cause forest fires to be worse. How is a temp increase that you cannot even notice cause forest fires to be worse?

@Metal-Brain
No, you are just too obtuse to understand what they are saying, I am not the least 'embarrassed' by ANY of this. YOU are the one not understanding or worse, thinking you know better than ANY scientist.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
No, you are just too obtuse to understand what they are saying, I am not the least 'embarrassed' by ANY of this. YOU are the one not understanding or worse, thinking you know better than ANY scientist.

Then post the number if you are not embarrassed at how puny the number is.

@Metal-Brain
YOU can post such numbers as well as me, so DO IT.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
YOU can post such numbers as well as me, so DO IT.

Why are you so terrified of posting the number?
Is it because the amount is so pathetically puny?

@Metal-Brain
Why can't YOU post the numbers? You afraid of what you will find?
YOU are the one want's the numbers so go for it.
But what is really going on here is you wanting to prove your superiority, plain and simple.

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
Why can't YOU post the numbers? You afraid of what you will find?
YOU are the one want's the numbers so go for it.
But what is really going on here is you wanting to prove your superiority, plain and simple.

You flatter me.

@Metal-Brain
Which you didn't deny I notice.