Personally, I'm pretty classical. As white, Ruy Lopez except in tournaments when, for variation (and to help me tell these games apart), it's also c4 and d4. I'm much enamoured with the 3. Bb5 against the Sicilian (Rossolimo and Moscow variations) but I wish there was more theory around.
As Black, I don't have a preference and my response depends on white.
Originally posted by vipiuAt the time I thought it wion't be worth it because I had two IM-Norms already, but couldn't get the third one. I also struggled to get over 2400 Elo.
why not worth?
For me it is a big goal...
But for being a FM you really don't have to achieve anything. Ok, you need to play I think 60 games with an average Rating performance of 2300. But that's it!!!!
But nevermind. It's not worth thinking about it now, because I do't play a lot of OTB chess these days.
Originally posted by wormwoodThere are many threads in which I have recommended Sicilian 2.c3 🙂
did you have a thread about 2.c3 at some point? I've been trying to pick it up recently, and it would be great to read someone's personal thoughts on it.
as white 1.f4-Nf3-g6, as black the dragon. 1900-2000 here.