Who was he?

Who was he?

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

STS

Joined
07 Feb 07
Moves
62961
19 Sep 08

Originally posted by diskamyl
wow, that was so weird! I was surprised when learning the exact same rule here in the forums a couple of months ago, and I had felt like a complete patzer, was ashamed of not knowing the rule.
Korchnoi knew the rule, he was just suffering from the stress and blew a synapse.

New Braunfels, Texas

Joined
22 Aug 07
Moves
72297
19 Sep 08

Originally posted by MontyMoose
Let people think about it and I'll post the answer later today.
Unless, of course, Sam comes along SEVEN minutes later and blabs the answer. 😠

STS

Joined
07 Feb 07
Moves
62961
20 Sep 08

Originally posted by MontyMoose
Unless, of course, Sam comes along SEVEN minutes later and blabs the answer. 😠
Not to worry, it doesn't look like anyone cared.

T

ALG

Joined
16 Dec 07
Moves
6190
20 Sep 08
1 edit

Originally posted by MontyMoose
In 1972 the rules for castling were changed. A requirement was added that the King and Rook must be on the same RANK. It would seem the requirement that neither King nor the Rook involved has moved would ensure they were on the same rank (original squares). Why was this change necessary? Let people think about it and I'll post the answer later today.
Because first it was legal to castle with promoted rooks.