Go back
whats with Ironman and Yozzer getting axed?

whats with Ironman and Yozzer getting axed?

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Hahahahahahaha.

No.

You got banned because you acted like an ass, your inappropriate clan name was the final straw. You were never the good guy and never will be. One player that you accused has later been found to be a cheater. How many did you accuse again? I forget, but I suspect it was at least 10.

Also, it's ridiculed.
wow!

you really are a sarcastic knowitall!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

I will state catagorically and emphatically that the insinuation that ironman31 is xxxxxxis a false hood of the highest order. xxxxxxis a legit, consummate chess player. You merely need to go to Gameknot and reveiw his game history; the guy is a fantastic chess player of depth and beauty, no machine my friends!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sartorius
I will state catagorically and emphatically that the insinuation that ironman31 is xxxxxxis a false hood of the highest order.xxxxxxis a legit, consummate chess player. You merely need to go to Gameknot and reveiw his game history; the guy is a fantastic chess player of depth and beauty, no machine my friends!
wait, lemme get this straight- someone is named Afro?

that's awesome.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ark13
Game 1235744 This one felt like an engine, and when I did analysis, almost every move matched up. However, my two Ironman games were won by incredible depth of thought, something that an engine has trouble with.
So maybe we're dealing with a very strong player that also uses computers. It's been said that such a player is better than either one alone.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I remember a thread where Ironman, gave a colorful and amazing analysis of one of his losses. What was going through his mind at the time and why he played the moves he played. It made a lot of sense and the it was definitely not computer talk.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hahahaaaa
I remember a thread where Ironman, gave a colorful and amazing analysis of one of his losses. What was going through his mind at the time and why he played the moves he played. It made a lot of sense and the it was definitely not computer talk.
It's incredible how these myths come about. Here's the thread: http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=20385

I would say his "analysis" is superficial and based mostly on database moves and other played games. In short, nothing any reasonably competent player couldn't do.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.