What is a

What is a "rook"?

Only Chess

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12351
09 Nov 12
1 edit

the names of the pieces are self-explanatory (king, queen, etc). But why is the rook named what it is? Is "rook" a term for someone that lives in a king's castle? I always assumed a rook was a term for a prince, since it has a crown on it's head like King and Queen, and is a major piece like they are.

The top four Google search results for rook"

Rook, Wikipedia (chess)
Rook, Wikipedia (card game)
Rook, Wikipedia (bird)
Rook Brand Clothing

No explanation of where the name "rook" comes from, in relation to chess.

And honestly, I guess I don't know where "pawn" comes from either. Is it an old-world term for "page", which is a young underling?

Milwaukee, WI

Joined
11 Dec 10
Moves
16731
09 Nov 12

Originally posted by vivify
the names of the pieces are self-explanatory (king, queen, etc). But why is the rook named what it is? Is "rook" a term for someone that lives in a king's castle? I always assumed a rook was a term for a prince, since it has a crown on it's head like King and Queen, and is a major piece like they are.

The top four Google search results for rook"

Rook ...[text shortened]... comes from either. Is it an old-world term for "page", which is a young underling?
Just guessing here, but I seem to recall that it may be an Indian term "ruhk" or "rukh" meaning chariot. I remember reading that somewhere but can't swear to it.

Milwaukee, WI

Joined
11 Dec 10
Moves
16731
09 Nov 12

Originally posted by Bebop5
Just guessing here, but I seem to recall that it may be an Indian term "ruhk" or "rukh" meaning chariot. I remember reading that somewhere but can't swear to it.
Just looked up "rukh"; actually a Persian term, meaning a mythological large bird that can carry great weights like elephants and such....

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
09 Nov 12

Originally posted by vivify
why is the rook named what it is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_(chess)

♖ ♜ borrowed from Persian رخ rokh, Sanskrit रथ rath, "chariot"

I always thought the rook was an elephant in the Indian game, the "castle" being the little fortified seat on top. Obviously I was wrong.

CHARIOT

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
09 Nov 12

Originally posted by vivify
And honestly, I guess I don't know where "pawn" comes from either. Is it an old-world term for "page", which is a young underling?
The word pawn actually is derived from the Old French word "paon" which comes from the Medieval Latin term for foot soldier, and is etymologically cognate to peon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pawn_(chess)#Etymology

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
09 Nov 12

Similar etymology as for pioneers, which is what
the pawns are at the beginning of the game!

rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12351
09 Nov 12

Thanks, Wolfgang, that was a big help. Now if we can just find the etymology of "rook", that would be awesome.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
10 Nov 12
2 edits

Originally posted by Bebop5
Just guessing here, but I seem to recall that it may be an Indian term "ruhk" or "rukh" meaning chariot. I remember reading that somewhere but can't swear to it.
yes this is the origin of the term, the same word in Urdu, from the Persian, Ruhk,
chariot. The queen was originally vizier, a high-ranking political adviser, again from
the Persian. Carrobie means cherub, from Persian, just sayin.

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
10 Nov 12

Originally posted by wolfgang59
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_(chess)

♖ ♜ borrowed from Persian رخ rokh, Sanskrit रथ rath, [b]"chariot"


I always thought the rook was an elephant in the Indian game, the "castle" being the little fortified seat on top. Obviously I was wrong.

CHARIOT[/b]
i understand what you mean. I have a chess set bought from Tunis in which the rooks are elephants.

rain

Joined
08 Mar 11
Moves
12351
10 Nov 12

Oh, so "elephants" or "chariots" is indeed the original meaning, then. So why then, is a rook represented with a crown, rather than wheels for the chariot, or with an elepphant head?

This reminds me; I used to play a game called "Battle Chess" for Nintendo, where you see an actual battle between two pieces, when one is captured. The rooks were represented by large rock-like monsters. It was really a moving, cylindrical part of a castle, with the "crown" being those posts archers shoot behind, like in this image:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Bodiam-castle-10My8-1197.jpg/300px-Bodiam-castle-10My8-1197.jpg

In light of this explanation, it makes a tad more sense, since I once thought a rook was a prince, represesnted with a crown.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
10 Nov 12

Originally posted by vivify
Thanks, Wolfgang, that was a big help. Now if we can just find the etymology of "rook", that would be awesome.
from Sanskrit and Persian as above

(unfortunately RHP doesnt cater for the character set)

wotagr8game

tbc

Joined
18 Feb 04
Moves
61941
10 Nov 12

Originally posted by vivify
Oh, so "elephants" or "chariots" is indeed the original meaning, then. So why then, is a rook represented with a crown, rather than wheels for the chariot, or with an elepphant head?

The standardisation of the pieces only came into effect in Staunton's era, he was consulted on what design the pieces should take in tournament play and hence we have the 'Staunton piece set'. The fact that these pieces don't necessarily represent or reflect their etymological origins may well have something to do with this.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
10 Nov 12

Originally posted by Bebop5
Just guessing here, but I seem to recall that it may be an Indian term "ruhk" or "rukh" meaning chariot. I remember reading that somewhere but can't swear to it.
That's correct. The latter: rukh.

You might have read it in H.J.R. Murray, A History of Chess (1913), as it is there.

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
10 Nov 12

Originally posted by Marinkatomb
The standardisation of the pieces only came into effect in Staunton's era, he was consulted on what design the pieces should take in tournament play and hence we have the 'Staunton piece set'. The fact that these pieces don't necessarily represent or reflect their etymological origins may well have something to do with this.
Found this in Encyclopedia Britannica, but it correlates with things that I have read in credible secondary sources.

"The standard for modern sets was established about 1835 with a simple design by an Englishman, Nathaniel Cook. After it was patented in 1849, the design was endorsed by Howard Staunton, then the world’s best player; because of Staunton’s extensive promotion, it subsequently became known as the Staunton pattern."

wotagr8game

tbc

Joined
18 Feb 04
Moves
61941
10 Nov 12

Originally posted by Wulebgr
Found this in Encyclopedia Britannica, but it correlates with things that I have read in credible secondary sources.

"The standard for modern sets was established about 1835 with a simple design by an Englishman, Nathaniel Cook. After it was patented in 1849, the design was endorsed by Howard Staunton, then the world’s best player; because of Staunton’s extensive promotion, it subsequently became known as the Staunton pattern."
Is that so, i was under the impression Staunton was involved in the design, you learn something new every day. 🙂

The names given to the pieces varies from country to country, if you really want to get a feel for the true meaning of the names, researching the foreign names might also give a clue. This is a table of names by language that may assist..

http://www.eudesign.com/chessops/basics/cpr-lang.htm