Originally posted by robbie carrobieI dunno... in a thread entitled "Skeeter back at 2400."... am I putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with 5 ? Maybe.. I've made worse mistakes.
you think, when neither was specifically addressed to them directly, well ok, thats fine,
she/he is simply trolling, but they should still put some chess content into their posts
along side the caustic diatribe, just to keep it legit!
Originally posted by thaughbaerhehe, please see the edited text, i posted a position in the interim, just to make it legitimate 🙂
I dunno... in a thread entitled "Skeeter back at 2400."... am I putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with 5 ? Maybe.. I've made worse mistakes.
Originally posted by thaughbaeryou should look at the position and try to work out the best move, its taken from
Should I really look at the game or go straight to the hidden for the punchline ? Not that I'm skeptical or anything.
Karpov, My best games, page 25. The game is Karpov v Uhlmann, Madrid 1973, French defence. [CO9] - regards Robbie.
p.s. Its entirely positional and strategic, i.e. non tactical.
Hi Robbie.
Just checked TOS cannot see the bit that says ALL players on the
front page must make valid contributions in the chess forums and supply the
other players with their opening ideas and their flaws.
Why is she here in the chess forum?
I cannot believe that bit. There is something darker going on here, something other than chess.
Perhaps she enjoys reading what is going on the Chess forum.
Other strong players do without making a comment.
The current No.2 player Caesare has not posted anything chess wise
in the forum either. Neither has 70% of the rest of the players on the front page.
I quote from a rare Caesare post. 28th Dec '10
"For example I don't like to discuss in forums, but I like to read,
what you guys are writing."
I have no problem with that. No problem at all. Neither has anybody else.
You have get over this phobia about a woman being the current No1 player
on here. These attacks are really dis-heartening and although Skeets dishes
it back in spades I'm sure she is just as bored with it as I am.
Mind you after reading a few of Skeeter's old posts.....
Some of the put downs and squabbles are quite hilarious.
She's being doing it since 2003 so maybe she is not bored with it after all.
BTW did you know Skeeter was the moving force behind in getting the
Spiritual Forum started up.
Thread 6792 and then they moaned about having one Thread 20459
I don't think she has ever posted in the Spiritual Forum either.
How does the rational work again?
No chess posted in the chess forum. Therefore not a good chess player.
Forget the fact her name is on the FIDE OTB rated list and is well over 2000.
It's higher than mine, much higher.
But...but...but....she does not post in the chess forum.
Jesus Wept.
But don't worry my paranoid friends. We have her.
Got you this time Skeets, no wriggling, you have slipped up big time.
No posts at all in the Spiritual Forum.
She's a Witch!
Tomorrow we march to New Zealand and burn her at the stake.
Robbie bring the kindling, Cludi (sorry, keep getting mixed up) Kopatov
bring the petrol. No need for matches, I'll just rub your heads together.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re Game:
Why with pawns on d4 and e5 did you think that c3 Bishop was better than that
Knight on e5 and save it with Bb4.
Continuing would have been grim but I've seen them spun around from here.
You never know. Yet to see anyone win a game by resigning.
Originally posted by greenpawn34I agree, he/she should be tied to a stake and thoroughly made to listen to endless
Hi Robbie.
Just checked [b]TOS cannot see the bit that says ALL players on the
front page must make valid contributions in the chess forums and supply the
other players with their opening ideas and their flaws.
Why is she here in the chess forum?
I cannot believe that bit. There is something darker going on here, something other than chess. spun around from here.
You never know. Yet to see anyone win a game by resigning.[/b]
cover versions of Black Lace's Agadoo after which she might also petition the site
owners for a bitchin and witchin forum. He/she may do better there 😉
As for the game, it was an opening disaster, all the signs were there, unprotected piece
on b4, weak f2 square, queen coming to h4, how the heck i never saw it, i will never
know! yes i did think the bishop would be better not at the time, but later on, tragic it
was, truly tragic!
Originally posted by greenpawn34I checked, there are no Skeeters listed by FIDE. Mind you there are no Diophantuses, Kopatovs or greenpawns either. You won't find any Diophantuses listed by ECF, ICCF, USCF or any other chess organisation. You will find some on other sites but most aren't me! So we don't know who is who or what their FIDE (or other "official"😉 rating is. Even if we think Ratboy33 is Magnus Carlsen how do we know for sure?
Forget the fact her name is on the FIDE OTB rated list and is well over 2000.
It's higher than mine, much higher.
And what is a Cludi anyway? I know Cluedo, I have played that game, but have never knowingly engaged in Cludi.
Originally posted by DiophantusApparently in Cludi you can drive around the board in a car while the other players are using dice.
I checked, there are no Skeeters listed by FIDE. Mind you there are no Diophantuses, Kopatovs or greenpawns either. You won't find any Diophantuses listed by ECF, ICCF, USCF or any other chess organisation. You will find some on other sites but most aren't me! So we don't know who is who or what their FIDE (or other "official"😉 rating is. Even if we think ...[text shortened]... anyway? I know Cluedo, I have played that game, but have never knowingly engaged in Cludi.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRobbie, my Scots friend, you are talking too much decent common sense. Beware, for this is a bannable offence where certain members are concerned.
what is skeety doing in chess only then? far as i can tell, not one of her posts contains any chess related material, nor has he/she evah evah evah evah evah posted any chess related material in the chess forum, or anywhere else for that matter, Kopatov is correct, its double standards to insist that he take his case to the bubble blowers in general while skeety is guilty of the very same thing, regardless of her motivations for doing so.
Richard
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
Originally posted by greenpawn34The difference between the two is, Caesare doesn't treat other players like dirt, either.
The current No.2 player Caesare has not posted anything chess wise
in the forum either. Neither has 70% of the rest of the players on the front page.
I quote from a rare Caesare post. 28th Dec '10
"For example I don't like to discuss in forums, but I like to read,
what you guys are writing."
I have no problem with that. No problem at all. Neither has anybody else.
I would have no problems whatsoever if skeeter chose not to post any chess-related material to the chess forum, if he also chose not to post any personal sledging, random accusations and outrageous attempts at insults to the same forum. But he does the latter and never the former.
Richard
Originally posted by Shallow BlueIt's not random. If there's one thing Skeeter has it's method.
I would have no problems whatsoever if skeeter chose not to post any chess-related material to the chess forum, if he also chose not to post any personal sledging, random accusations and outrageous attempts at insults to the same forum. But he does the latter and never the former.
Richard
Originally posted by kopatovGet in there quick. The proofs there.. before it's gone.. I'm printing it now.
Can we see some proof please Green Pawn and skeeter? Thread 141958
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI did.. FAIL.. I was nowhere near. Karpov 1 Thaugbaer 0.. interesting to see his thought process tho..
you should look at the position and try to work out the best move, its taken from
Karpov, My best games, page 25. The game is Karpov v Uhlmann, Madrid 1973, French defence. [CO9] - regards Robbie.
p.s. Its entirely positional and strategic, i.e. non tactical.