Go back
Skeeter back at 2400.

Skeeter back at 2400.

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Shallow Blue
Well, duh. That article was obviously written by a certain well-known first-page RHP player.

Self-aggrandisement? Not much...

Richard
A well known first-page player? Who? Where is the article referred to posted? Is it on chess.com?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Hi WW

I was the same when I first joined. I was told all kinds of players were cheating.
Nah!
I just could not see why a good player would need to use a box.

Perhaps I did not want to believe it.

And I was 99% sure I could spot a box in use just by looking at a game.
(I was wanting to see that good box v good box game to see they played
some 100% box moves. There are such things.)

And I really honestly believed that the users were a harmless handful.
Blokes having a laugh. See who could last the longest, get the highest grade
before getting caught etc.

"But why?" was my response when I was told the place was full of them.

(why pay money to join a site just have a computer play your chess for you...) 😕

--------------------------------

Jan 09 sticks out because there were loads of PM's flying about then
that the mods had finally advised the admin that Big Ron be banned.

No1 (and Skeets) have nailed more cheats on here than all non-mods
put together but at the end of the day all they can really do is raise an FTP.
(I don't know, was No1. ever a mod on here?)
The graft and real work is done by a mod. And gathering the evidence takes time.

what is it? 20+ games with more than 20 non theory moves v good opposition.
(It's something like that...forgive me if I'm wrong.) to get the match up details.

There is no doubt the name of Big Ron and his pedigree stalled things.
We still do not know for sure why he was banned. The owners waited for
over just 100 days after his last move before banning him. I don't know
if that had any bearing on the matter.

Maybe they did not want to admit No1 was right all those years ago. 🙂

Anyway we both agree he should have gone. I just tried to offer an explanation,
right or wrong, why the delay. It's a messy and sad business.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I presume skeeter has had too much wine to drink and created this post Thread 141899 To the peolpe who claim that skeeter is a "woman" or a "she", that is most unladylike. A "skeeter" is a diminutive nickname for Scott, so "skeeter" could be a bloke hiding behind that username.

GP, you have fallen for a bloke, Scott. 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kopatov
I presume skeeter has had too much wine to drink and created this post Thread 141899 To the peolpe who claim that skeeter is a "woman" or a "she", that is most unladylike. A "skeeter" is a diminutive nickname for Scott, so "skeeter" could be a bloke hiding behind that username.

GP, you have fallen for a bloke, Scott. 😀
So who were you in a previous existence?


PM me or drop into Tram Crash. It'll be a suprise.

skeets


Originally posted by skeeter
PM me or drop into Tram Crash. It'll be a suprise.

skeets
That might be difficult. Apparently you are ignoring me for some reason. Presumably I have offended without even trying. Ah well, I can't say I mind ignorance - it is bliss apparently.


Trolling attempts deflected. Skeeter is still back on the "menu", ready to be disciplined by 1500 OTB kids.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Diophantus
That might be difficult. Apparently you are ignoring me for some reason. Presumably I have offended without even trying. Ah well, I can't say I mind ignorance - it is bliss apparently.
Lord knows i have tried my hardest to annoy dear Skeety, i think he/she secretly fancies me though, just proves, you treat em mean to keep em keen! 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Lord knows i have tried my hardest to annoy dear Skeety, i think he/she secretly fancies me though, just proves, you treat em mean to keep em keen! 😛
Don't you have a rule in Scotland, you can only whip them on Sunday?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Lord knows i have tried my hardest to annoy dear Skeety, i think he/she secretly fancies me though, just proves, you treat em mean to keep em keen! 😛
I dunno about being fancied by a guy hiding as a woman. That is way too creepy.

1 edit

I dunno about being creeped by a returning 3(b) either - regardless of its sex. Eww..

skeets

1 edit

Originally posted by sonhouse
Don't you have a rule in Scotland, you can only whip them on Sunday?
No whuppings on Sundays, in fact if you go to the Western Isles, no anything on a Sunday! They're living in the past!

1 edit

Originally posted by kopatov
I dunno about being fancied by a guy hiding as a woman. That is way too creepy.
LOL, you might be right , making chess moves in a maxi dress to hide those hairy legs is kinda creepy, meh nothing a good waxing cannot fix!

1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
LOL, you might be right , making chess moves in a maxi dress to hide those hairy legs is kinda creepy, meh nothing a good waxing cannot fix!
A hairy chest, hairy legs and a warped sense of humour means skeeter/Scott could find a role as an extra in a SCI-FI movie.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kopatov
A hairy chest, hairy legs and a warped sense of humour means skeeter/Scott could find a role as an extra in a SCI-FI movie.
maybe they are Borg, half organic, half machine! just turn up to the set and start assimilating people! Resistance is futile! gives a whole new meaning to the term 'fork'!

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.