What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

1383 Spaz!

Originally posted by Von Bardeleben
lol

1200 new

1500 Spazbait

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

2500 Spaz-key?!

Originally posted by Anthony Paton
2500 Spaz-key?!

Originally posted by Ramned
What d'you think (no bias?) would be the rating ranges for the following categories of skill levels: Elite, accomplished, good, average, inexperienced/bad, terrible.

Example 0-600 terrible etc

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
Elite: 2500+
Accomplished: 2200-2499
Good: 1800-2199
Average: 1400-1799
Inexperienced: 1000-1399
Newbie ( I don't like calling people negative names like "bad" and "terrible"😉: under 1000

Just by opinion.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
What would you call under 1000?

Newbie?......What about Novice?

Originally posted by Wulebgr
[b]

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

b]

Originally posted by Wulebgr
below 2000: patzers
above 2000: cheaters

just kidding

The USCF has a system that makes sense. You could adopt it too.

2200+ master
2000-2199 expert
1800-1999 A class
1600-1799 B class
1400-1599 C class
1200-1399 D class
etc.

The Russians have a similar system: master, candidate master, etc.

Originally posted by Mephisto2
This belongs in the paradox thread, no 😉