29 Jan 08
Originally posted by GatecrasherBut, is game moderation suspended until this new approach is implemented, or is it going on?
Send Feedback. Category: Game Moderation.
The Site Admins are planning a new approach to game moderation. I have no details. I hope it will be effective.
29 Jan 08
Originally posted by GatecrasherIn that case, I leave here my recognition for the great job the game moderation team has done, when it existed.
Only that volunteers will no longer be involved in game moderation until further notice. It is now solely the responsibility of the Site Admins.
It's a dirt work, that usually doesn't count with the simpathy of many people, that needed to be done, and you carried it out with great efficiency, prudency and, most of all, discretion.
So my thanks to cludi, Gatecrasher and whoever was the third member (I forgot now. Sorry.)
30 Jan 08
Originally posted by GatecrasherObviously some dubious techno-fix is planned as the Site Admins are unqualified for the task of identifying engine users as their chess knowledge is minimal.
Only that volunteers will no longer be involved in game moderation until further notice. It is now solely the responsibility of the Site Admins.
31 Jan 08
Originally posted by no1marauderthe old method doesn't rely on the mods being strong players either. maybe they're just making the same process automatic?
Obviously some dubious techno-fix is planned as the Site Admins are unqualified for the task of identifying engine users as their chess knowledge is minimal.
31 Jan 08
Originally posted by wormwoodI doubt it was coincidence that they includ(i)ed two strong players in the game mod team. It sounds strange to me to do it without any involvement of strong players, and that it is apparently done without consulting the previous game mod team. Oh well, we'll see what happens. Thanks to the game mod team for all their work!
the old method doesn't rely on the mods being strong players either.
31 Jan 08
Originally posted by scandiumI doubt anyone stays here just for that. They're losing a great deal of money from jimster, jean hebert, kingcaptured, ih8sens etc... they were loyal paying customers. And Im sure people wont leave for just that
I think they'll lose more if they don't. What is the point of 3(b) if its not enforced?
31 Jan 08
1 edit
Originally posted by HomerJSimpsonThere have only been five (3b) bannings since September 1 of last year, and that scarcely constitutes a great deal of money.
I doubt anyone stays here just for that. They're losing a great deal of money from jimster, jean hebert, kingcaptured, ih8sens etc... they were loyal paying customers. And Im sure people wont leave for just that
So, try a new premise, everyone.