Developing quickly in the opening is not a leisurely activity.
Its more than simply moving a new piece into the centre every move.

Chess is a fight right from the start.

Look for tactics or combinations that don`t win you any material but instead result in you being ahead in development.

Try to force yourself to be ahead in development by forcing means.
For example sacrifice material in order to be ahead in development.

Oops I spelled Daily wrong.

Correction....Daley chess thought
🙂

that's a relief

Originally posted by National Master Dale
Developing quickly in the opening is not a leisurely activity.
Its more than simply moving a new piece into the centre every move.

Chess is a fight right from the start.

Look for tactics or combinations that don`t win you any material but instead result in you being ahead in development.

Try to force yourself to be ahead in development by forcing means.
For example sacrifice material in order to be ahead in development.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I like to sacrifice development in order to be ahead in material. 😕

Originally posted by Artardo
Your not actually winning material, you're just borrowing it. Eventually, you'll have to return it, and probably with interest!

Originally posted by Artardo
Your not actually winning material, you're just borrowing it. Eventually, you'll have to return it, and probably with interest!

Originally posted by KnightStalker47
By that logic, then gambits must be the best openings🙄

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I like to sacrifice development in order to be ahead in material. 😕

Originally posted by National Master Dale
Developing quickly in the opening is not a leisurely activity.
Its more than simply moving a new piece into the centre every move.

Chess is a fight right from the start.

Look for tactics or combinations that don`t win you any material but instead result in you being ahead in development.

Try to force yourself to be ahead in development by forcing means.
For example sacrifice material in order to be ahead in development.

One point of material advantage is exactly the same worth as one point of strategic advantage.

I gladly sac my queen to have a sure mate in sight.
But I also gladly let my opponent sac antyhing that is unsound.

Originally posted by FabianFnas
One point of material advantage is exactly the same worth as one point of strategic advantage.

I gladly sac my queen to have a sure mate in sight.
But I also gladly let my opponent sac antyhing that is unsound.

Originally posted by wormwood
how does one obtain a point of strategic advantage?

Originally posted by Mad Rook
Never mind that... I'm still trying to figure out how he'd refuse to let his opponent sac something that's sound.