- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 16957
Originally posted by Automatoni know... this made me feel better though (same tournament)
My god man...😞
Game 5829645
😀
Chess fundamentals by Capablanca is an all in one type of thing. Also his 'Last Lectures' and Lasker's 'Common sense in chess.'
I heard that 'Masters of the chess board' by Reti has alot of good advice in.
I've just started reading Chess master vs Chess amateur by Euwe and I'm really enjoying it.
Originally posted by Automaton"My System" does a lot of what you're asking. It's not too advanced for anyone I don't think.
I study tactics.
I just want a good manual to explain the "why?" of the moves.
Or the "why?" of the openings. Or what do I do now? etc.
I found "My System" by Nimzowitch and the reviews say It will be too advanced for me.
With Lasker's manual It may be out-dated, it was written almost 100 years ago!
Originally posted by AutomatonWhy not read the various kind of chess magazines? They have a flora of openings, tactics, strategies, analyses, problems, biographies, and virtually everything you want to in a healthy mix!
An "all in one" chess manual?
I was at the bookstore and there were about 100 chess books to choose from.
Most were openings or opening variations. A few endgame books and some tactics books.
None had the "all in one" approach except for some basic ones that are too easy for me.
My 1600 rating here is only because I am beating up on lower rated playe ...[text shortened]... best player, just a little better.
Anyone studied that book? Or should I keep looking?
Recommending a chessbook is very difficult because what works for one player does absolutely nothing for another.
The 2 books I got the most out of are the lesser known work "Mastering Chess,a course in 21 lessons".
Chapter topics are
-tactics & combinations
-analysing a position
-formulating a plan
-opening principles and ideas
-endings
-practical tournament tips (haven't read this chapter)
And "Best lessons of a chesscoach",which also seems lesser known.
Topics are too much to mention.I'll just say it taught me a thing or two about color complexes,the initiative,outposts,piece coordination,isolated pawns,space advantage etc..
The author selected 10 games to explain these,and more,things.
Both are a light read,compared to some other chessbooks anyway,with plenty diagrams.The way a chessbook ought to be,imo.
For me they were a perfect fit 🙂
Originally posted by jonrothwellyup, i love Retis books, they are easy to read and full of insight and most of all interesting! this last point cannot be overlooked, for it is the basic failure of education, to teach persons about things in which they have no interest. Get a book that is interesting and it is half the battle, you shall be enthralled and want to learn. why is Reti so interesting? firstly he deals with the historical development, from the combinational sacrifices of Andersson, through the introduction of strategic and positional concepts from Morphy through to Capa and Lasker, Tarrasch etc and the thougt processes which led the masters to make their chioces. Each and every principle is discussed and illustrated with games. It is simply a joy to read. i also have the capa book but was put off by it after hearing that he was less than gentlemanly. i have never read 'my system', although i believe it is similar to Bangievs, square strategy theory, which i have. If it is positional concepts that you are interested in , Try Micheal Steins simple chess, its an awesome book, very, very clear, much better than Silman who can explain simple things in great detail, but fails to explain complex things simply! I think its a bit like searching for the Holy Grail, an all in one manual.
Chess fundamentals by Capablanca is an all in one type of thing. Also his 'Last Lectures' and Lasker's 'Common sense in chess.'
I heard that 'Masters of the chess board' by Reti has alot of good advice in.
I've just started reading Chess master vs Chess amateur by Euwe and I'm really enjoying it.
Originally posted by Automatonchessmaster GM edition + some good game collection book of a player you like + rybka for post-mortem analysis + consistent chesstempo training would be enough take you to 1800.
I was at the bookstore and there were about 100 chess books to choose from.
Most were openings or opening variations. A few endgame books and some tactics books.
None had the "all in one" approach except for some basic ones that are too easy for me.
My 1600 rating here is only because I am beating up on lower rated players. I am about 1400 on other webs xt best player, just a little better.
Anyone studied that book? Or should I keep looking?
that is of course in case you take each of them (mostly chesstempo) seriously and not skip a day.
and in whatever you do, reading books, watching videos etc, the most important thing is to use your brain. Watching/reading just gets you familiar. Calculating gets you better.
Hi Automaton.
The Mammoth Book of Chess
It covers everything and I mean everything.
It's section on tactics with the puzzles is very good.
All the standard endings you need to know.
The ideas plus two complete examples (tactical and strategical) in all the major
and not so common openings.
All this and a lot more. (a lot lot more).
It's cheap (under £10.00) 530 pages crammed with good advice, great games
and well chosen examples.
It was voted book of the year and one I fully recommend it to anyone
wishing to improve.
A punters reveiw here:
http://www.chessworld.net/chessclubs/forums_thread_show_one_posteronleftstyle.asp?forumid=6015&ThreadID=3386955