The keeping our heads-down thread.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I have not made a single negative post towards Drewnogal.

In the midst of prolific, incessant, attempted high-toxicity bullying of drewnogal by Duchess64 you pointedly endorsed Duchess64.

@ghost-of-a-duke said

I have not made a single negative post towards Drewnogal.

That’s debatable.

One thing is for certain, you didn’t defend her when she was being harangued by Stella, Lottie21 et al. And it is clear that you are now a appliance of vicious troll, duchess64.

It is interesting to observe how you have decayed in the last year; transforming from a principled pillar of the RHP community to this wet-tissue of a character.

@divegeester said
That’s debatable.

One thing is for certain, you didn’t defend her when she was being harangued by Stella, Lottie21 et al. And it is clear that you are now a appliance of vicious troll, duchess64.

It is interesting to observe how you have decayed in the last year; transforming from a principled pillar of the RHP community to this wet-tissue of a character.

No, it is not debatable.

And your starting position was a wet-tissue character.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
No, it is not debatable.

And your starting position was a wet-tissue character.

. . . A wet tissue stuck to someone else's shoe.

@fmf said
In the midst of prolific, incessant, attempted high-toxicity bullying of drewnogal by Duchess64 you pointedly endorsed Duchess64.

I supported the decision to block a poster that used pornagraphic images. What I didn't support was publically accusing a new member of being the same person, even if their sudden appearance did raise suspicions. Far better to report such suspicions to the Mods than possibly accusing somebody entirely innocent. Don't you think?!

Nowhere in this did I post or support negative comments towards Drewnogal. I had no problem however seeing the Duchess giving yourself and Dive a run for your money.

What we did get however was Dive suggesting to Drewongal that the Ghost Chamber was collectively thumbing her down when it was blatantly obvious a person with multiple accounts was thumbing down in bulk. (Even Torrun got 8 thumbs down for one post which is completely unbelievable). I avoided all other vitriol across numerous threads.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Nowhere in this did I post or support negative comments towards Drewnogal. I had no problem however seeing the Duchess giving yourself and Dive a run for your money.

No, she did not give anyone a run for their money. She made a fool of herself yet again. And so have you.

Endorsing Duchess64, ostentatiously, while she is engaged in trolling drewnogal in such a relentlessly poisonous way is simply encouraging her ~ and encouraging her, whether you like being called out for it or not, is participating in what she is doing.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
What I didn't support was publically accusing a new member of being the same person, even if their sudden appearance did raise suspicions. Far better to report such suspicions to the Mods than possibly accusing somebody entirely innocent. Don't you think?!

I disagree with you. drewnogal handled the Stella situation well. And divesgeester handled the various other screen names used by the Stella poster well, too.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
What I didn't support was publically accusing a new member of being the same person, even if their sudden appearance did raise suspicions. Far better to report such suspicions to the Mods than possibly accusing somebody entirely innocent. Don't you think?!

Not at all, it happens here frequently, you’ve done it yourself in the past.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I avoided all other vitriol across numerous threads.

Well, I was not posting any vitriol on any of those threads, nor was drewnogal, whereas Suzianne and Duchess64 were posting massive amounts of repetitive vitriol, much of it aimed at drewnogal.

Some of the vitriol aimed at me was so dementedly personalized, it was hilarious, although not intended to be. Quite deliberately, I wasn't replying in kind. You can go and look.

So when you say you "avoided all other vitriol", and then you suggested Duchess64 stay on this forum, while I should leave it, you are trying to pass off your partisan sour grape spinelessness as some kind of principle.

I am posting just the same now as I did 5 or 10 years ago, whereas since last year you have become a self-parody of the poster and friend you used to be.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I supported the decision to block a poster that used pornagraphic images.

How holy of you.

@fmf said

I am posting just the same now as I did 5 or 10 years ago, whereas since last year you have become a self-parody of the poster and friend you used to be.

I am far more consistent in character, on and off this site.