Originally posted by Great Big SteesYes, Stees. Fact is, you've gone to the heart of the matter. I'm thinking an entirely new internet language that would communicate more effectively and be much easier to use should be invented. Questions: Do we begin from scratch or with what we already know? Would there be a need for dictionaries and/or Google; would this new language have a name? (gb)
You may but are you able?
I think perhaps that one should merely attack the problem at its source and treat words as they are known to be defined. This is the way adults expect to be understood.
Hint: Those who say "It depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is." are just trying to dodge the question, or laugh while you fumble for an explanation of what you meant. There's no need in the world to "explain" further if the words are used how they're commonly defined, as is the case 99.9% of the time. Those who ask for your definition are obviously stalling or trolling you. I have no tolerance for those people. When asked to "define" a word I used in a question, I say "I'm not Webster. Answer the question."
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYes. "Unnecessary".
Yes, Stees. Fact is, you've gone to the heart of the matter. I'm thinking an entirely new internet language that would communicate more effectively and be much easier to use should be invented. Questions: Do we begin from scratch or with what we already know? Would there be a need for dictionaries and/or Google; would this new language have a name? (gb)
Originally posted by Suzianneif i ask you if i am trolling you, am i indeed trolling you???
I think perhaps that one should merely attack the problem at its source and treat words as they are known to be defined. This is the way adults expect to be understood.
Hint: Those who say "It depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is." are just trying to dodge the question, or laugh while you fumble for an explanation of what you meant. Ther ...[text shortened]... define" a word I used in a question, I say "I'm not Webster. Answer the question."
Originally posted by coquette"May I ask you a question?" (thread title)
Help me to understand how in any way or form that is not a question.
"I'm not sure if the question is clear, if not please comment so I can try to improve upon it." (gb)
"Help me to understand how in any way or form that is not a question." (CQ)
Perhaps the thread's title and original post combine in an attempt to illustrate the difficulties of internet language (and to get the conversational ball rolling). Do you think gb's initial non-question and your non-question may be 2nd cousins? (bg) lol
Originally posted by coquetteTrue. Siblings are zeroth family relationship/generation removed. Time, though, in cyber villages and public internet forums moves at Plus Nano Speed. So, the ages of our '2nd cousins' would be linked to vastly different removes.
only if you incest
Your post occurred 5 hours after my original post. Perhaps an hour in this time zone may equal 70 years. If so, the two non-questions would be 5th Cousins (without cyber incest, as far as anyone knows). ~Uncle Bobby
Originally posted by SuzianneI like that. Terrific statement.
I think perhaps that one should merely attack the problem at its source and treat words as they are known to be defined. This is the way adults expect to be understood.
Hint: Those who say "It depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is." are just trying to dodge the question, or laugh while you fumble for an explanation of what you meant. Ther ...[text shortened]... define" a word I used in a question, I say "I'm not Webster. Answer the question."
...a new internet language must above all facilitate honesty. all weasel words must go wherever unneeded words go to die. maybe begin with the simplest of things: a) lousy, stinkin emails could be spoken of as "ishmails"; b) similarly, an internet forum "post" within this unwanted word category becomes "poost". tone of meaning matters more than words. (gb)