Youth and Protest

Youth and Protest

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
28 Oct 10

Originally posted by John W Booth
I'm with you, Eladar. Each nation state and/or civilization beyond our own shores needs an analytical adjective to sum up their relative inadequacy succinctly.
You're FMF pretending to be a Sam the Sham clone? You have such a strange sense of humour.

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
28 Oct 10

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
You're FMF pretending to be a Sam the Sham clone? You have such a strange sense of humour.
He is DSR pretending to be FMF impersonating a Sam the Sham clone.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
28 Oct 10

Originally posted by kmax87
... ah, the arrogance of youth...
Youth still have lives to live. Those who are about to die should not define how we live.

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
28 Oct 10

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Youth still have lives to live. Those who are about to die should not define how we live.
How we live? How old are you exactly?

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
28 Oct 10

Originally posted by darvlay
How we live? How old are you exactly?
A/S/L?!

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
28 Oct 10

Originally posted by darvlay
Forgive me if this topic has already been discussed as I just returned from a European vacation. Watching the news I saw a lot of different footage of the protests in France regarding the change in retirement age. I found this coverage humorous for a couple reasons:

1. The raising of the retirement age from 60 to 62. Am I out of my head to think that ...[text shortened]... nothing better to do or are their youth really that concerned about the retirement age?
Forgive me if this topic has already been discussed as I just returned from a European vacation. Watching the news I saw a lot of different footage of the protests in France regarding the change in retirement age. I found this coverage humorous for a couple reasons:

1. The raising of the retirement age from 60 to 62. Am I out of my head to think that this is hardly a big deal at all? I am shocked that people feel they have the right to retire at such an early age.

The question should be why does the retirement age need to increase in the first place?

2. I saw footage of a lot of angry protestors with balaclavas and what not trying to provoke police, etc. All the protestors I saw acting this way couldn't have been older than 25 and didn't look like they had ever held a meaningful job in their lives. Is this a case of naive and restless youth in France with nothing better to do or are their youth really that concerned about the retirement age?

It was way more than just young punks with buttons on their shirts. Why should the average working man be forced to work 2 extra years because a bunch of bankers gambled and lost?

It's class warfare all over, again. It will only get worse in the coming years. California anyone?

anybody seen my

underpants??

Joined
01 Sep 06
Moves
56453
01 Nov 10

Originally posted by darvlay
Forgive me if this topic has already been discussed as I just returned from a European vacation. Watching the news I saw a lot of different footage of the protests in France regarding the change in retirement age. I found this coverage humorous for a couple reasons:

1. The raising of the retirement age from 60 to 62. Am I out of my head to think that ...[text shortened]... nothing better to do or are their youth really that concerned about the retirement age?
this may have been offered already but here goes:

In a country with high unemployment, one of the few ways that jobs become available is through retirement. If a whole group of workers must retire two years later, that backs up the people trying to enter the job market.

It has been suggested that one way to quickly end unemployement in the US is to have a six month window where workers from 62-65 can retire at full benefits including medicaire. this would open up millions of jobs quickly. There would be little cost to the government because the new workers currently on unemployment would come of the dole and be paying the unemployment taxes of the newly retired.

the employers would benefit because newer workers would be working for lower wages. Everyone wins.