Why are there so many people in the US jails?

Why are there so many people in the US jails?

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
07 Dec 09

another reason could be that states that are not experiencing higher levels of crime feel no need to incarcerate criminals at higher rates.

D
incipit parodia

Joined
01 Aug 07
Moves
46580
07 Dec 09

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://www.podval.org/~sds/jails.html

Why are there so many people in the US jails?

The US jail population as a proportion of the general national population is the largest in the developed world.

Why?

I can think of three explanations:

Socialism
US has too little socialism (welfare etc) to keep the underclass (i.e., the people who do n ...[text shortened]... cing guidelines
US sentencing guidelines are much stricter than in other countries.

...
That's not all the link says! Why did you leave out the bit about the failure of the mental health system?

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
07 Dec 09

Originally posted by sh76
And, of course, by "happiness" you can only be referring to bong hits and the like. Correct?
For some people; for some that's medicine.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
07 Dec 09
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
That's an interesting article; I'll read it later.

But just as a matter of common sense, how could keeping the criminals in prison for longer NOT reduce crime?
There's a segment of population which has adjusted to the fact that it's going to be spending quite a bit of time in jail for stupid reasons, and has decided to use that time as a crime training camp.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
08 Dec 09
1 edit

Okay; I think I see what you're (DrKF) getting at regarding the harsher sentencing rules perhaps not being a deterrent on others.

But the point of incarceration is not just deterrence. It is incapacitation also. If harsher sentencing decreases crime through incapacitation rather than deterrence, does it really matter?

There are good reasons to reduce sentence lengths and lighten punishments in general. But, I don't think that the fact that these sentences work to reduce crime through incapacitation rather than deterrence is one of them.

Guppy poo

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
87863
08 Dec 09

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://www.podval.org/~sds/jails.html

Why are there so many people in the US jails?

The US jail population as a proportion of the general national population is the largest in the developed world.

Why?

I can think of three explanations:

Socialism
US has too little socialism (welfare etc) to keep the underclass (i.e., the people who do n ...[text shortened]... cing guidelines
US sentencing guidelines are much stricter than in other countries.

...
Privatised jails.
If you're running prison for a profit (like using them as back-offices for banks and plane-companies), justice very quickly comes second to pleasing share holders.

That and you're locking away school kids for having food fights and adult women for smoking marijuana...

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
08 Dec 09

Originally posted by sh76
[b]Between 1991 and 1998, those states that increased incarceration at rates that were less than the national average experienced a larger decline in crime rates than those states that increased incarceration at rates higher than the national average.

Okay, contest: Who was able to read that sentence and understand it the first time through? Whoever was wins a virtual Snapple. 😉[/b]
i think i did, but probably i was adding the context that DrK likely would not have posted the opposite.