10 Nov 18
@no1marauder saidFriday has come and gone. What is Mueller waiting for? For DJT to get rid of Rosenstein? He is getting the axe next. You know that, right?
What is your source of information that Mueller "fattened his bank account" from money obtained from Manafort?
Trump hardly acts like he is "being controlled" by the investigation. Do you have anything that is not a crackpot theory with no basis in fact?
The mid-terms ended barely a day ago. So far, Mueller has announced indictments on Fridays. We'll see if something happens tomorrow.
@sonhouse saidHere is a 25 second video of Mueller promoting the Iraq invasion. Only 25 seconds so take the time.
You think Mueller is in it for the money? You denigrate a great man if so. A decorated war hero, former head of the FBI, a by the book dude. I would vote for him for president.
Pro war propaganda is not some theory. It is science.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S036381110300047X
Do I have to keep reminding you about how Mueller and Comey screwed up big time. They are incompetent idiots!
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2017/05/21/when_comey_and_mueller_bungled_the_anthrax_case_133953.html
If you have any doubt at all that Mueller and Comey are major league a-holes check out this nova episode so you are fully aware of how corrupt those a-holes were in finding scapegoats to blame for it. Hatfield was exonerated and Ivins could not have possibly done it alone. He was probably innocent too. How convenient that he committed suicide before they could charge him with the crime.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/military/anthrax-investigation.html
Edit: Frontline has a documentary about it.
10 Nov 18
@metal-brain saidMaybe, but the right wing was giddily claiming that back in September.
Friday has come and gone. What is Mueller waiting for? For DJT to get rid of Rosenstein? He is getting the axe next. You know that, right?
In the end, you, Mott and the rest are going to look foolish; I have little doubt that Mueller is going to close out the investigation with a bang.
@no1marauder saidthat's cool...you look foolish right now!
Maybe, but the right wing was giddily claiming that back in September.
In the end, you, Mott and the rest are going to look foolish; I have little doubt that Mueller is going to close out the investigation with a bang.
@mott-the-hoople saidHow'd your midterm election prediction work out?
that's cool...you look foolish right now!
And, of course, you were one of the right wingers who claimed Rosenstein was out in September; I believe you even started a thread about it.
And you thought a judge was going to throw out all the charges against Manafort back in May.
Your record isn't too good here. Mott.
10 Nov 18
@no1marauder saidwhy are you lying? None of what you just posted is true. You are a lying weasle
How'd your midterm election prediction work out?
And, of course, you were one of the right wingers who claimed Rosenstein was out in September; I believe you even started a thread about it.
And you thought a judge was going to throw out all the charges against Manafort back in May.
Your record isn't too good here. Mott.
@mott-the-hoople saidhttps://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/they-begin-devouring-one-another.178534
why are you lying? None of what you just posted is true. You are a lying weasle
EDIT: Took a bit but: https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/meuller-caught.176782
10 Nov 18
@no1marauder saidI'm using the after mid-term excuse with this one. After all, DJT waited until after M-TE to get rid of Sessions. When the investigation is out of Rosenstein's hands DJT will be free to ask for his resignation as well. We will see if Whitaker is confirmed.
Maybe, but the right wing was giddily claiming that back in September.
In the end, you, Mott and the rest are going to look foolish; I have little doubt that Mueller is going to close out the investigation with a bang.
@metal-brain saidHave you done a serious look at that Whitaker assswipe? You know, the one just told to repay the money that corrupt company paid him and he refused? The one who already decided the outcome of the Mueller probe even though he knows zero about it, it's a witchhunt, should be shut down and all that, even though already there have been a bunch of guilty verdicts already and no doubt more to come as M gets closer to Trump's family, as corrupt as Trump himself. And the one who should not even BE in that position because it takes a successful congressional confirmation which Whitaker never had and never will if sane people vote on him.
I'm using the after mid-term excuse with this one. After all, DJT waited until after M-TE to get rid of Sessions. When the investigation is out of Rosenstein's hands DJT will be free to ask for his resignation as well. We will see if Whitaker is confirmed.
And under sane people the succession would have gone to the #2 guy, Rosenstein. Did you ever even THINK why that didn't happen? Of course not, since you are a brainwashed trumpite.
But for you, none of that means shyte does it, Trump can do no wrong......
10 Nov 18
@metal-brain saidThe investigation is already in Whittaker's hands (who I seriously doubt will even be nominated to the AG position). There's no practical reason for the Donald to fire Rosenstein and some considerable risk (the new House would surely want his testimony regarding Trump's efforts at obstructing Mueller's investigation) but Trump is often petty and irrational so he may well force Rosenstein out.
I'm using the after mid-term excuse with this one. After all, DJT waited until after M-TE to get rid of Sessions. When the investigation is out of Rosenstein's hands DJT will be free to ask for his resignation as well. We will see if Whitaker is confirmed.
I feel reasonably confident that Mueller has prepared for these contingencies and that they will not succeed in derailing justice.
@no1marauder saidWho said anything about derailing justice? There are other reasons to get rid of Rosenstein. Sessions could not take over the investigation because he recused himself. He needs Whittaker there long enough to learn the case, but after that there is no reason to keep Rosenstein.
The investigation is already in Whittaker's hands (who I seriously doubt will even be nominated to the AG position). There's no practical reason for the Donald to fire Rosenstein and some considerable risk (the new House would surely want his testimony regarding Trump's efforts at obstructing Mueller's investigation) but Trump is often petty and irrational so he may well ...[text shortened]... at Mueller has prepared for these contingencies and that they will not succeed in derailing justice.
10 Nov 18
@sonhouse saidWe were not talking about Whitaker, we were talking about Mueller.
Have you done a serious look at that Whitaker assswipe? You know, the one just told to repay the money that corrupt company paid him and he refused? The one who already decided the outcome of the Mueller probe even though he knows zero about it, it's a witchhunt, should be shut down and all that, even though already there have been a bunch of guilty verdicts already and no d ...[text shortened]... a brainwashed trumpite.
But for you, none of that means shyte does it, Trump can do no wrong......
Do you still think Mueller is a great guy?
@metal-brain saidWe know why Trump forced Sessions out. He is certainly hoping Whittaker can stop Mueller, something Sessions couldn't.
Who said anything about derailing justice? There are other reasons to get rid of Rosenstein. Sessions could not take over the investigation because he recused himself. He needs Whittaker there long enough to learn the case, but after that there is no reason to keep Rosenstein.
Rosenstein has been in public service for over 20 years. Trump himself nominated him for his present position and he was confirmed 94-6 by the US Senate. There is no reason to replace him but Trump's petty anger that he would not obstruct justice by curtailing Mueller's investigation.
@no1marauder saidoh...wearing a wire to facilitate a coup on our president is nothing is it?
We know why Trump forced Sessions out. He is certainly hoping Whittaker can stop Mueller, something Sessions couldn't.
Rosenstein has been in public service for over 20 years. Trump himself nominated him for his present position and he was confirmed 94-6 by the US Senate. There is no reason to replace him but Trump's petty anger that he would not obstruct justice by curtailing Mueller's investigation.
@mott-the-hoople saidThere was a "coup"? Guess I missed that bit of (mis)information.
oh...wearing a wire to facilitate a coup on our president is nothing is it?