The money required is in the hands of the ultra wealthy and they refuse to let it be taxed. They also don't buy stuff very much so your tax wouldn't help.
As far as "who pays for it" - who pays for what exactly? The weapons are already in existence. The troops are already trained.
I think there is plenty of money floating around the economy to pay for it.
I suppose the weapons used didn't really need to be in existance at all. We don't have to replace them, countries like China or Russia would never attack us. We have countries like Germany and France to defend us if we're attacked!
Originally posted by Eladar I think there is plenty of money floating around the economy to pay for it.
I suppose the weapons used didn't really need to be in existance at all. We don't have to replace them, countries like China or Russia would never attack us. We have countries like Germany and France to defend us if we're attacked!
The economy's not doing too well my friend.
The weapons we have are obsolete. Replacing them is irrelevant with respect to the current conflict.
Originally posted by Eladar You called them obsolete, not me.
I called them obsolete because they are. That's why our government spends so much money inventing new weapons all the time. You wouldn't want to be flying an F-4 against a Sukhoi Flanker for example.
Did you know we have massive warehouses full of battleship ammunition that we never use? One of these days they're going to figure out how to stick JDAM on them I bet.
Originally posted by Eladar It is sucky when compared to what the US economy used to be.
Well, it could be fifth or so, with some reforms, but 9th is still very good especially considering the population of the US (China, for example, is 94th on the same 2010 IMF list), and hardly "sucky".
Originally posted by KazetNagorra Well, it could be fifth or so, with some reforms, but 9th is still very good especially considering the population of the US (China, for example, is 94th on the same 2010 IMF list), and hardly "sucky".