18 Jul '21 17:11>
I watched some political talk shows today and they had the Surgeon General talking and he didn't make any effort at all to correct common misinformation going around on social media. Why not? He had the perfect opportunity to get the message out about specific myths.
What is the misinformation? Is it a secret? Is the misinformation so dangerous that he cannot even mention it, even to correct the myth?
All he had to do is bring up a subject to debunk. Let's use Graphene Oxide for an example. Here is a claim I don't know much about, but has become popular lately. Heck, I don't even know if Graphene Oxide is toxic as claimed. I saw some articles promoting the use of it in vaccines. Aside from that I know nothing about it.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-graphene-oxide-a-toxic-substance-in-the-vial-of-the-covid-19-mrna-vaccine/5750340
All he had to say is that it is not true and is a claim made by some hacks in Spain. Myth debunked. Then he could address another myth.
How do we know it is misinformation they don't like. If they will not give a single example maybe it is the truth they have a problem with. That would explain why they don't try to debunk them. Notice they will not claim the mRNA vaccines are not gene therapy. They know the FDA classifies mRNA treatment as gene therapy.
Yeah, the government wants to pressure facebook into censoring the truth. That makes more sense. They don't even give a website to read common myths and facts. If it was misinformation they had a problem with, they would talk about the specific myths and debunk them.
It is the truth they have a problem with. They don't want to get caught lying like Fauci did so many times. Notice Fauci is nowhere on TV to talk about it. That is because he is leading spreader of misinformation. It would be obvious hypocrisy that would go viral on facebook. They condone that though. Nobody censored his lies.
Nobody should condone this hypocrisy. It is too obvious to defend it.
What is the misinformation? Is it a secret? Is the misinformation so dangerous that he cannot even mention it, even to correct the myth?
All he had to do is bring up a subject to debunk. Let's use Graphene Oxide for an example. Here is a claim I don't know much about, but has become popular lately. Heck, I don't even know if Graphene Oxide is toxic as claimed. I saw some articles promoting the use of it in vaccines. Aside from that I know nothing about it.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-graphene-oxide-a-toxic-substance-in-the-vial-of-the-covid-19-mrna-vaccine/5750340
All he had to say is that it is not true and is a claim made by some hacks in Spain. Myth debunked. Then he could address another myth.
How do we know it is misinformation they don't like. If they will not give a single example maybe it is the truth they have a problem with. That would explain why they don't try to debunk them. Notice they will not claim the mRNA vaccines are not gene therapy. They know the FDA classifies mRNA treatment as gene therapy.
Yeah, the government wants to pressure facebook into censoring the truth. That makes more sense. They don't even give a website to read common myths and facts. If it was misinformation they had a problem with, they would talk about the specific myths and debunk them.
It is the truth they have a problem with. They don't want to get caught lying like Fauci did so many times. Notice Fauci is nowhere on TV to talk about it. That is because he is leading spreader of misinformation. It would be obvious hypocrisy that would go viral on facebook. They condone that though. Nobody censored his lies.
Nobody should condone this hypocrisy. It is too obvious to defend it.