11 Dec 16
Originally posted by KazetNagorraYou can't, plain and simple.
I don't have to "explain" how talk about handkerchiefs and maps is not about paedophilia.
People who allege child abuse has taken place have to provide the evidence. None has been provided, the best efforts of amateur code-breakers notwithstanding.
If being ridiculed bothers you, I recommend staying clear of ridiculous conspiracy theories and not lowering yourself to the level of a President-Elect.
No one can.
Another explanation is not possible because it's unavailable.
The president elect didn't stumble upon this; these are the results of leaked emails and otherwise undiscovered blog entries.
Your ridicule is your own undoing: it has no effect on the facts of this situation.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWhen I see people discussing walnuts the most likely explanation is that they are discussing walnuts. That there were leaked e-mails containing discussions of walnuts doesn't mean that there is something sinister behind it. These are "the facts of the situation." If you have evidence that there is a paedophilia ring, notify law enforcement.
You can't, plain and simple.
No one can.
Another explanation is not possible because it's unavailable.
The president elect didn't stumble upon this; these are the results of leaked emails and otherwise undiscovered blog entries.
Your ridicule is your own undoing: it has no effect on the facts of this situation.
11 Dec 16
Originally posted by KazetNagorraExplain just the two sentences already quoted.
When I see people discussing walnuts the most likely explanation is that they are discussing walnuts. That there were leaked e-mails containing discussions of walnuts doesn't mean that there is something sinister behind it. These are "the facts of the situation." If you have evidence that there is a paedophilia ring, notify law enforcement.
Forget the walnuts for now.
Tell me you can make something normative--- anything normative--- from either of those sentenced.
Do your best to convince yourself first and then the reasonable reader that code isn't being invoked.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHOK - first convince me that your posts aren't code for you bragging about being the ringleader of a paedophilia ring.
Explain just the two sentences already quoted.
Forget the walnuts for now.
Tell me you can make something normative--- anything normative--- from either of those sentenced.
Do your best to convince yourself first and then the reasonable reader that code isn't being invoked.
11 Dec 16
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThat's about the size of it: you know the sentences cannot be explained, so you follow the same, predictable tack... throw dispersions on the opponent.
OK - first convince me that your posts aren't code for you bragging about being the ringleader of a paedophilia ring.
Slag off, loser.
12 Dec 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBHThose last words...
It's idiotic thinking such as you have demonstrated repeatedly which keeps the real issues at bay.
If these two snippets from a trove of bizarre and otherwise inexplicable exchanges were the ONLY evidence, we would still be merely examining something uniquely awry.
Not only unprofessional, but inappropriate and disqualifying as a result--- without any ot ...[text shortened]... pt and sick these pervs are who have been in power for the last forty years.
Choice is yours.
Nobody's denying the political system isn't corrupt or broken.
Hell, as a communist I agree with that sentiment in 100% of the countries on this planet.
What beggers belief though, is that you think Trump is going to change it.
That's stupidity on a whole new level.
12 Dec 16
Originally posted by FreakyKBH"Slag off"? Who says "slag off"? Something fishy there. I think "slag off" is code language for "I run a paedophilia ring." Disagree? Disprove it!
That's about the size of it: you know the sentences cannot be explained, so you follow the same, predictable tack... throw dispersions on the opponent.
Slag off, loser.
12 Dec 16
Originally posted by shavixmirOh, he might change things. He is a diplomatic bull in a china shop. You see what he is already doing to China-US relations saying Taiwan should be independent when the US has said there is a one China policy in place since 1973.
Those last words...
Nobody's denying the political system isn't corrupt or broken.
Hell, as a communist I agree with that sentiment in 100% of the countries on this planet.
What beggers belief though, is that you think Trump is going to change it.
That's stupidity on a whole new level.
I can see it now, US sends in one hundred F35's and a couple of nuclear subs, giving them to the Taiwanese forces, and then China says, ok, you want to play. You perhaps remember that 10 trillion dollars you owe us? We want it NOW.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraThis is exactly the tack your ilk takes: you are unable to face the truth of the facts in this case, so instead you nervously distract, divert and otherwise ignore reality.
No, I want you to disprove that your use of "slag off" is code for "I run a paedophilia ring." Your refusal to do so clearly indicates that you do, in fact, run a paedophilia ring.
Watch the video.
Hell: watch any video which has done the slightest amount of research on the topic and answer away.
Scratch that: you won't be able to, so save your valiant efforts at mocking the reality that this country's highest power brokers are deeply embroiled in pedophilia and satanic ritualism.
Keep your head firmly up your ass, so as not to be bothered with what is going on around you.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWhy are you denying the obvious evidence that FreakyKBH is the leader of a paedophilia ring? Just watch this video, look carefully at the proofs.
This is exactly the tack your ilk takes: you are unable to face the truth of the facts in this case, so instead you nervously distract, divert and otherwise ignore reality.
Watch the video.
Hell: watch any video which has done the slightest amount of research on the topic and answer away.
Scratch that: you won't be able to, so save your valiant effort ...[text shortened]...
Keep your head firmly up your ass, so as not to be bothered with what is going on around you.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraKeep it up, jackass.
Why are you denying the obvious evidence that FreakyKBH is the leader of a paedophilia ring? Just watch this video, look carefully at the proofs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Just like your bet that Trump would lose in the election, you're always losing...
no more clear than in this one, wherein you insist nothing is amiss when it's all clearly going to hell.