Market Forces v Regulation

Market Forces v Regulation

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
14 Aug 10

China examines milk powder 'premature puberty' reports

China's government is investigating reports that a brand of powdered milk caused infant girls to grow breasts.

It is being alleged that hormone-tainted milk from Synutra International caused several cases of premature puberty in Hubei province.

The Chinese firm, whose shares fell by up to 35% on the news, strongly denies its products were tainted.

Food safety problems involving milk powder and other products have alarmed Chinese consumers in recent years.


The rest here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-10955585

Does the fact that Synutra International's shares have fallen by up to 35% give heart to those who argue that the free market can regulate food safety more effectively than government interference can?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
14 Aug 10

Without proper regulation, you'll just see a boom-and-bust-cycle of food poisoning and dairy companies going bankrupt, and new ones selling poisonous food replacing them.

Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
14 Aug 10

Originally posted by FMF
[b]China examines milk powder 'premature puberty' reports

[quote]China's government is investigating reports that a brand of powdered milk caused infant girls to grow breasts.

It is being alleged that hormone-tainted milk from Synutra International caused several cases of premature puberty in Hubei province.

The Chinese firm, whose shares fell by up ...[text shortened]... the free market can regulate food safety more effectively than government interference can?[/b]
Upton Sinclair answered that question for you decades ago.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
14 Aug 10

The answer to your question is of course not. Things like protecting the nation's food supply definitely falls in the realm of the government's shpere. Sure, the market works after something bad happens, but hopefully regulations will prevent the bad things from happening.

s
Granny

Parts Unknown

Joined
19 Jan 07
Moves
73159
14 Aug 10

Originally posted by rwingett
Upton Sinclair answered that question for you decades ago.
Can Upton Sinclair tell me why my nipples are sore ?

UNCLE GRANNY.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
15 Aug 10

Originally posted by FMF
[b]China examines milk powder 'premature puberty' reports

[quote]China's government is investigating reports that a brand of powdered milk caused infant girls to grow breasts.

It is being alleged that hormone-tainted milk from Synutra International caused several cases of premature puberty in Hubei province.

The Chinese firm, whose shares fell by up ...[text shortened]... the free market can regulate food safety more effectively than government interference can?[/b]
I may be overestimating some, but I have trouble believing anyone would argue that government regulation should play no part whatsoever in regulating the safety of food.

Market forces help, of course, but if there's ever a proper government function, it's ensuring that the food we eat is safe.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
15 Aug 10
2 edits

Originally posted by sh76
I may be overestimating some, but I have trouble believing anyone would argue that government regulation should play no part whatsoever in regulating the safety of food.
We shall see.

If they don't come forward perhaps we can unearth and dust off previous posts.

One line of argument I seem to recall was private companies vying to offer safety endorsements - that the customers could freely assess, ignore, adhere to for themselves - and losing share value or going bankrupt if there were deaths despite their endorsements. The free market in action. No more 'nanny state'.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
15 Aug 10

Originally posted by FMF
We shall see.

If they don't come forward perhaps we can unearth and dust off previous posts.

One line of argument I seem to recall was private companies vying to offer safety endorsements - that the customers could freely assess, ignore, adhere to for themselves - and losing share value or going bankrupt if there were deaths despite their endorsements. The free market in action. No more 'nanny state'.
Yes. I think you also remember who posted such preposterous nonsense.