2 edits
Suzianne straightened me out yesterday, that, there are THREE parties. Not just Dem and Repub. I’d said Dems plan to do away with Senate and Presidency. She says the group known as DemocratSocialists is ‘the group’ that promotes that. A 3rd group. Dam.
Query: is it logical that socialists try to make themselves to be ‘part of ‘ the Dem party, by stealing the word Democrat” to add to their name? Are they trying to fool people ,,,when their platform is NOT that of the Dems.unknowing people Like ME would be fooled to vote for them. See below:
The Moderate/Centrist View: Many moderate Democrats (such as Representative Josh Gottheimer) maintain that true socialism and the Democratic Party are fundamentally incompatible, warning that socialist platforms alienate mainstream and swing voters.
So is it nefarious for socialists to cop the name of the traditional 200-year old Party?
Why not “The Socislist Party”? Be proud Socialists, stand on your own, by God. Don’t be thieving faeries. Get our stuff, and now get our NAME???!!?
@AverageJoe1 saidA socialist party running for government jn a democratic system is a democratic party.
Suzianne straightened me out yesterday, that, there are THREE parties. Not just Dem and Repub. I’d said Dems plan to do away with Senate and Presidency. She says the group known as DemocratSocialists is ‘the group’ that promotes that. A 3rd group. Dam.
Query: is it logical that socialists try to make themselves to be ‘part of ‘ the Dem party, by stealing the word Demo ...[text shortened]... ts, stand on your own, by God. Don’t be thieving faeries. Get our stuff, and now get our NAME???!!?
Democratic socialism generally refers to a party which wishes to nationalise various things like energy, water and infrastructure.
There’s surely nothing wrong with people having choices?
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThe two most well-known Democratic Socialists in Congress (Sen. Bernie Sanders (VT - I) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY - D)) do not agree with abolishing the Senate, which is what YOU claim the DSA wants.
Suzianne straightened me out yesterday, that, there are THREE parties. Not just Dem and Repub. I’d said Dems plan to do away with Senate and Presidency. She says the group known as DemocratSocialists is ‘the group’ that promotes that. A 3rd group. Dam.
Query: is it logical that socialists try to make themselves to be ‘part of ‘ the Dem party, by stealing the word Demo ...[text shortened]... ts, stand on your own, by God. Don’t be thieving faeries. Get our stuff, and now get our NAME???!!?
@Suzianne saidNo I don’t think after 250 years that we should meddle with any of 3 branches as required by the Constitution. Do you? Is not the electoral college part of the structure of the constitution?
The two most well-known Democratic Socialists in Congress (Sen. Bernie Sanders (VT - I) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY - D)) do not agree with abolishing the Senate, which is what YOU claim the DSA wants.
What is diff tween you and me on the constitution? What?
@shavixmir saidOf course not, the word choice is my favorite word to use on the forum. Like I have said that women who get pregnant want to get pregnant, that is a choice they make. You have not liked that word, though, when it is inconvenient.
A socialist party running for government jn a democratic system is a democratic party.
Democratic socialism generally refers to a party which wishes to nationalise various things like energy, water and infrastructure.
There’s surely nothing wrong with people having choices?
Go figure.
@shavixmir saidHang on now, you're trying to give people the rights enjoyed by corporations. Cant have that!
A socialist party running for government jn a democratic system is a democratic party.
Democratic socialism generally refers to a party which wishes to nationalise various things like energy, water and infrastructure.
There’s surely nothing wrong with people having choices?
@kmax87 saidNow for those who dont get satire, irony or sarcasm, obviously government can either promote the interests of the people (preferred) or the interests of the business community.(not always good for the people)
Hang on now, you're trying to give people the rights enjoyed by corporations. Cant have that!
@AverageJoe1 saidHillary was right.
Of course not, the word choice is my favorite word to use on the forum. Like I have said that women who get pregnant want to get pregnant, that is a choice they make. You have not liked that word, though, when it is inconvenient.
Go figure.
You ARE deplorable.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe founding fathers never envisioned an America where the People cannot possibly stand up to a tyrannical government that has tanks and missiles with a handgun or even a hunting rifle.
No I don’t think after 250 years that we should meddle with any of 3 branches as required by the Constitution. Do you? Is not the electoral college part of the structure of the constitution?
What is diff tween you and me on the constitution? What?
We repealed the 18th Amendment with the 21st. No reason why we cannot repeal the 2nd for being useless at best, and killing innocent people at worst. Prohibition never killed people.
Same goes for the ridiculously out of touch Electoral College.
You have a president who has repeatedly ignored the 14th Amendment and now you have the heuvos to claim that Democrats don't like the Constitution?
STFU, hypocrite.
@Suzianne saidDo you respect the constitution as it stands or only the constitution you would prefer I have. You appear willing to dismiss constitutional provisions when you consider them outdated or politically inconvenient. And by the way, I would love for you to tell us where the president has violated the constitution, the particular specific provision of the 14th. And give us the legal reasoning.
The founding fathers never envisioned an America where the People cannot possibly stand up to a tyrannical government that has tanks and missiles with a handgun or even a hunting rifle.
We repealed the 18th Amendment with the 21st. No reason why we cannot repeal the 2nd for being useless at best, and killing innocent people at worst. Prohibition never killed people.
...[text shortened]... you have the heuvos to claim that Democrats don't like the Constitution?
STFU, hypocrite.
Really, what is the difference between your approach to the constitution and mine? I think mine would have more basis, my approach that is. Liberals are not real good with approaches.
1 edit
@Suzianne saidHey Sue, I know that none of your friends are responding to this thread , and I would imagine the reason is that the title of it is very overwhelming for them. They do not have an answer for it..
The founding fathers never envisioned an America where the People cannot possibly stand up to a tyrannical government that has tanks and missiles with a handgun or even a hunting rifle.
We repealed the 18th Amendment with the 21st. No reason why we cannot repeal the 2nd for being useless at best, and killing innocent people at worst. Prohibition never killed people.
...[text shortened]... you have the heuvos to claim that Democrats don't like the Constitution?
STFU, hypocrite.
You are right by the way. The founding fathers never envisioned what was ahead of us 250 years later.
Have you seen what’s going on?ššš©š„µš±š«¢š«¢š§š®
@AverageJoe1 saidYes, I've seen what's going on and I find it remarkably appalling that almost half the country believes that Donald Trump is the best solution. To any problem facing America. Hitler did Germany no favors, either, except maybe to show them the type of leadership that needs to be stopped before it happens.
Hey Sue, I know that none of your friends are responding to this thread , and I would imagine the reason is that the title of it is very overwhelming for them. They do not have an answer for it..
You are right by the way. The founding fathers never envisioned what was ahead of us 250 years later.
Have you seen what’s going on?ššš©š„µš±š«¢š«¢š§š®
@Suzianne saidWould Sayed or Mamdani (no free buses nor any goverrrnnnnnnnment grocery stores) have a better plan for a productive more independent society of Americans?
Yes, I've seen what's going on and I find it remarkably appalling that almost half the country believes that Donald Trump is the best solution. To any problem facing America. Hitler did Germany no favors, either, except maybe to show them the type of leadership that needs to be stopped before it happens.
I’m just trying to get a fix here…….
@AverageJoe1 saidThere are hundreds of political parties. The corporate news media only pays attention to 2 though. That way people will think they only have 2 choices and will vote that way.
Suzianne straightened me out yesterday, that, there are THREE parties. Not just Dem and Repub. I’d said Dems plan to do away with Senate and Presidency. She says the group known as DemocratSocialists is ‘the group’ that promotes that. A 3rd group. Dam.
Query: is it logical that socialists try to make themselves to be ‘part of ‘ the Dem party, by stealing the word Demo ...[text shortened]... ts, stand on your own, by God. Don’t be thieving faeries. Get our stuff, and now get our NAME???!!?
High jacked democracies always have 2 parties. It is easier to control people that way. If people thought they had another choice that could win they would abandon the 2 major parties. Just because people vote for the 2 major parties does not mean they are happy with either. They just do not feel like they have a realistic choice.