@wildgrass saidDon’t waste your time writing this stupid sht to me, it’s for your tds flake buddies.
If you stick to facts, you'll have to admit that the doctor's report was wrong/false. There never was a 2 cm wide wound in Trump's ear cartilage. You need to string your own version of facts together that you made up in order to make it make sense, because the wound didn't exist 2 weeks later.
I haven't made anything up, fact wise. The rest is speculation, but it is biza ...[text shortened]... hink the FBI started an investigation but I don't think they've released any information since 2024.
2 edits
@wildgrass said??? I don’t care, it’s foolish!!! The dr report I gave you is what I believe. One more time he wore a bandage on his earl with plenty of time to heal a small scab. A scar are you nuts, it would be very tiny and difficult to see.
Do you think the doctors report was real or fake?
A 2 cm wound in cartilage is much much more severe than what you describe in earlier comments.
I’m sure you have had tiny scabs on you, look for a noticeable scar from them.
1 edit
@mike69 saidNah man, you want it both ways. The doctor report you gave me said 2 centimeters in the cartilage. 2 centimeters is not tiny. 2 centimeters wide is the width of the largest part of your thumb, it's impossible that a wound that large would be a "small scab". People of his age who get wounds like that, normally they take many months to heal.
??? I don’t care, it’s foolish!!! The dr report I gave you is what I believe. One more time he wore a bandage on his earl with plenty of time to heal a small scab. A scar are you nuts, it would be very tiny and difficult to see??
2 centimeters is larger than the wound in Evander Holyfield's ear and that wound is still not healed. And it's been almost 30 years.
Even if the wound were half that size, it's still going to be visible years later.
Are you nuts?
@wildgrass saidEnjoy, it’s your show.. I’m tired of this topic sorry.
Nah man, you want it both ways. The doctor report you gave me said 2 centimeters in the cartilage. 2 centimeters is not tiny. 2 centimeters wide is the width of the largest part of your thumb, it's impossible that a wound that large would be a "small scab". People of his age who get wounds like that, normally they take many months to heal.
2 centimeters is larger than th ...[text shortened]... Holyfield's ear and that wound is still not healed. And it's been almost 30 years.
Are you nuts?