1 edit
@AverageJoe1 said"people want stuff" is a bad argument in favor of it. Why do they want it and what will it do?
I would think thatyou would know that Congress decides how tax money is spent. They may decide to send $100,000 to all 194 countries. If they do, then that is what we voted for, for representative folks. That takes you out of the picture since you want majority vote! 🤔. you didn’t think average Joe forgot that you said that, did you.
Curious, though, with that min ...[text shortened]... you are a hypocrite or not. You would be the best one to know, would you not, but you seem to be?
The experts seem to think that voter ID will disenfranchise voters, which is illegal. It won't do much at all to prevent voter fraud.
Gullicism at its finest. Give the people what they want. Why? Because they want it. Why? Who cares just give it to them.
@wildgrass saidI don’t think we should give anything to anybody. I think that should work for it. Silly me. Govt should give them security and military protection and liberty and freedom. The government does not even give us hospitals it highways or schools… We give all of those entities to ourselves through taxes. What is it about the government with you people?
"people want stuff" is a bad argument in favor of it. Why do they want it and what will it do?
The experts seem to think that voter ID will disenfranchise voters, which is illegal. It won't do much at all to prevent voter fraud.
Gullicism at its finest. Give the people what they want. Why? Because they want it. Why? Who cares just give it to them.
Yeah, we have done the photo ID thingy enough, the weakest argument is marauder who says that it is too much trouble for people to go get a photo ID card. They may even have to do it two or three times in their lives. That would be just horrible. That is what marauder says. Trust me
Conversely, I say, me average Joe, that every couple of weeks someone has to get in the car or walk to a grocery store a total time of which may take an hour, which would be about 26 times a year of all that trouble. Marauder thinks that is not trouble, but he thinks she has trouble to go get a ID once or twice a year.
Obviously, he is lying, and will not tell us the real reason. I will leave that to you to figure out.
Marauder should learn not to mess with average Joe
@AverageJoe1 saidI'm sure you see the problem then, when you use arguments like "lots of people want something so we should give it to them."
I don’t think we should give anything to anybody. I think that should work for it. Silly me. Govt should give them security and military protection and liberty and freedom. The government does not even give us hospitals it highways or schools… We give all of those entities to ourselves through taxes. What is it about the government with you people?
Yeah, we have done ...[text shortened]... eason. I will leave that to you to figure out.
Marauder should learn not to mess with average Joe
But you're using that argument a lot to defend voter ID requirement laws. If you were to use other arguments, like 'this and this number of fraudulent votes are cast, enough to swing elections' or 'voter ID has been studied and will prevent X number of fraudulent ballots to be cast'
Something like that?
@mike69 saidYou're saying the would-be president was shot and almost died from a bullet, and no one has ever provided a description of the wound? You made up a fake description of the wound because no information is available.
If no actual wound wouldn’t it have to be fake blood on his head.
You're saying the would-be assassin was shot and killed by a counter sniper and yet no one knows the name of the sniper and he never received any recognition for his insanely impressive shooting skills?
Far fetched. A more likely scenario is that he wasn't shot.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidWe’ve already had this talk, not sure why you’re restarting it? Go back and look where I sent you the video with doctor reports. Anymore questions (Again) go back and re read our post. I’m not going to bother with the last part of your post, it’s silly.
You're saying the would-be president was shot and almost died from a bullet, and no one has ever provided a description of the wound? You made up a fake description of the wound because no information is available.
You're saying the would-be assassin was shot and killed by a counter sniper and yet no one knows the name of the sniper and he never received any recognition ...[text shortened]... insanely impressive shooting skills?
Far fetched. A more likely scenario is that he wasn't shot.
@mike69 saidAll I ask for is the name of the hero who sniped the assassin.
We’ve already had this talk, not sure why you’re restarting it? Go back and look where I sent you the video with doctor reports. Anymore questions (Again) go back and re read our post. I’m not going to bother with the last part of your post, it’s silly.
@wildgrass said????? If it’s really not out there, then it must be protocol. What is the difference knowing or not who shot the sniper killing him. We know one did or do you think he was killed from outer space?
All I ask for is the name of the hero who sniped the assassin.
@wildgrass saidThat isn’t all you asked for, along with not answering.
All I ask for is the name of the hero who sniped the assassin.
@wildgrass saidWhy did you write this proving there is a report???
About what? Do you believe Trump's doctors account of the injury or not?
@mike69 saidMay be true. But the absence of even the name of the sniper is only one of the extremely bizarre currently unknown things that should be known 1.5 years later. We know who took down Reagan's assassin, there were books and interviews.
That isn’t all you asked for, along with not answering.
The most bizarre thing I think is the complete lack of any evidence of a wound less than 2 weeks later. No scab, no scratch, nothing at all. I think you'd have to be crazy to think that ear was hit with a bullet.
@wildgrass saidBeen answered over the last three or four times you’ve brought it up, go back and read all of your post and answers. The only thing weird is how your brain is having issues listening and processing facts instead of the story you created in your head and only looking at lib information. I don’t care about your conspiracy, it dumb.
May be true. But the absence of even the name of the sniper is only one of the extremely bizarre currently unknown things that should be known 1.5 years later. We know who took down Reagan's assassin, there were books and interviews.
The most bizarre thing I think is the complete lack of any evidence of a wound less than 2 weeks later. No scab, no scratch, nothing at all. I think you'd have to be crazy to think that ear was hit with a bullet.
@mike69 saidWow three people thumbed this down, there’s a whole pack😂😂😂
@wildgrass
I believe 100% it was an actual assignation attempt and his ear was slightly nicked. Tell me the reasons you think and feel so strongly that the republican party felt they had to go to this high of an extreme and risk to Trumps life at that time.
1 edit
@mike69 saidIf you stick to facts, you'll have to admit that the doctor's report was wrong/false. There never was a 2 cm wide wound in Trump's ear cartilage. You need to string your own version of facts together that you made up in order to make it make sense, because the wound didn't exist 2 weeks later.
Been answered over the last three or four times you’ve brought it up, go back and read all of your post and answers. The only thing weird is how your brain is having issues listening and processing facts instead of the story you created in your head and only looking at lib information. I don’t care about your conspiracy, it dumb.
I haven't made anything up, fact wise. The rest is speculation, but it is bizarre that there are also so many other unknowns so long after this occurred. I think the FBI started an investigation but I don't think they've released any information since 2024.