@vivify saidIvermectin is FDA-approved for human use and very safe.
Agreed, a couple in Nevada used hydroxychloroquine and went to the hospital; the husband died.
People are using ivermectin, a medicine for treating parasitic worms in horses.
This extreme propaganda needs to stop.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/
Stop spreading disinformation. You are repeating big pharma propaganda. You should be ashamed of yourself. You are the very example of covid extremism I was talking about. Did you lock anyone in the trunk of your car yet?
Now tell us what you think of the new pills to treat covid under patent protection. Is that just fine with you because it costs a lot more? Oh, wait...you don't profit from that. Are you going to defend those dangerous pills anyway?
16 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidYeah. But not for fukking covid, you brainless knee jerk.
Ivermectin is FDA-approved for human use and very safe.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/
Stop spreading disinformation. You are repeating big pharma propaganda. You should be ashamed of yourself. You are the very example of covid extremism I was talking about. Did you lock anyone in the trunk of your car yet?
Now tell us what you think of the ...[text shortened]... t more? Oh, wait...you don't profit from that. Are you going to defend those dangerous pills anyway?
16 Jan 22
@shavixmir saidThat is because of corruption from big pharma. There is no profit in a drug that no longer has patent protection. Merck turned against their own drug in favor of another which has no long term safety record like ivermectin does.
Yeah. But not for fukking covid, you brainless knee jerk.
https://www.cnet.com/health/mercks-covid-pill-what-we-know-about-the-antivirals-effectiveness-eligibility-and-cost/
Funny how the FDA approves new drugs under patent protection even when they are less safe. This isn't about saving lives to them. It is about money.
16 Jan 22
@shagdoodyforbrains
https://www.tennisworldusa.org/tennis/news/Tennis_Interviews/102836/jeremy-chardy-i-regret-getting-vaccinated-i-have-series-of-problems-now/
@metal-brain saidNo. No it is not.
That is because of corruption from big pharma. There is no profit in a drug that no longer has patent protection. Merck turned against their own drug in favor of another which has no long term safety record like ivermectin does.
https://www.cnet.com/health/mercks-covid-pill-what-we-know-about-the-antivirals-effectiveness-eligibility-and-cost/
Funny how the FDA appro ...[text shortened]... t protection even when they are less safe. This isn't about saving lives to them. It is about money.
It’s due to the properties of the medicine and what it’s made for and in equal parts it’s due to the RNA make-up of Covid.
Perhaps if you break your knee, you can stick a paracetemol op your arse to heal the bone.
16 Jan 22
@wajoma said@why yo Ma’s a whore
@shagdoodyforbrains
https://www.tennisworldusa.org/tennis/news/Tennis_Interviews/102836/jeremy-chardy-i-regret-getting-vaccinated-i-have-series-of-problems-now/
The CDC, the NHS, the WHO, the RIVM and every bloody health authority in the world.
Moron.
16 Jan 22
@shavixmir saidAn athlete (and not the only one) whose livelihood depends on his health versus a bunch of career bureaurats whose livelihoods depend on their obedience and towing the party line.
@why yo Ma’s a whore
The CDC, the NHS, the WHO, the RIVM and every bloody health authority in the world.
Moron.
Yeah, nah, I'll trust the science and the science say's you're playing with fire when you're playing with the seizure syrup.
@metal-brain saidFrom your own article: "the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven"
Ivermectin is FDA-approved for human use and very safe.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/
Stop spreading disinformation. You are repeating big pharma propaganda. You should be ashamed of yourself. You are the very example of covid extremism I was talking about. Did you lock anyone in the trunk of your car yet?
Now tell us what you think of the ...[text shortened]... t more? Oh, wait...you don't profit from that. Are you going to defend those dangerous pills anyway?
That was published online in 2020. Fast forward, the FDA explicitly stated why Ivermectin should *not* be used. See this article from December 20, 2021:
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
"Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19"
Now that you know the FDA explicitly says *not* to use Ivermectin for Covid-19, continuing to push this claim would disinformation, and you'd better stop immediately.
16 Jan 22
@vivify saidThat is because government will not fund any studies to determine that, but India is a strong indication it is an effective treatment.
From your own article: "the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven"
That was published online in 2020. Fast forward, the FDA explicitly stated why Ivermectin should *not* be used. See this article from December, 20, 2021:
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-should-not-use-ivermectin-treat-or-prevent-covid-19
"[b]Why You ...[text shortened]... for Covid-19, continuing to push this claim would disinformation, and you'd better stop immediately.
The antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven ineffective against covid.......and government has no intention of finding out. Big pharma is clearly not confident ivermectin isn't effective. If they were they would want a study to prove it and be done with it.
The FDA has been corrupted. They changed the definition of vaccines to include gene therapy and thus have immunity from liability.
16 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidYou used an outdated article from a government website when you thought it helped your point but won't trust updated government info when it refutes you.
That is because government will not fund any studies to determine that, but India is a strong indication it is an effective treatment.
The antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven ineffective against covid.......and government has no intention of finding out. Big pharma is clearly not confident ivermectin isn't effective. If they were they wou ...[text shortened]... ey changed the definition of vaccines to include gene therapy and thus have immunity from liability.
You are knowingly promoting false information and should be banned.
16 Jan 22
@wajoma saidA complete and utter retard then.
An athlete (and not the only one) whose livelihood depends on his health versus a bunch of career bureaurats whose livelihoods depend on their obedience and towing the party line.
Yeah, nah, I'll trust the science and the science say's you're playing with fire when you're playing with the seizure syrup.
16 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidIt is not!
That is because government will not fund any studies to determine that, but India is a strong indication it is an effective treatment.
The antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven ineffective against covid.......and government has no intention of finding out. Big pharma is clearly not confident ivermectin isn't effective. If they were they wou ...[text shortened]... ey changed the definition of vaccines to include gene therapy and thus have immunity from liability.
God damn, boy.
You’re leaking retardedness all over the forum.
16 Jan 22
@shavixmir saidIt is.
It is not!
God damn, boy.
You’re leaking retardedness all over the forum.
Stop lying.