06 Feb 23
@Mott-The-Hoople
A comprised President is Trump having his head up Putin's rear end in Helsinki.
Whine all you want. Helsinki isn't going away. 😉
06 Feb 23
@mott-the-hoople saidLMAO! Well put your trust in Trump and his prior administration figures, sucker.
that means absolutely nothing…these people have lied before…that is provable
I have little doubt that a senior DoD official isn't going to just make up such a claim out of thin air; the Pentagon has already offered to brief former officials.
Right wingers never admit error here, but this one is likely to end in embarrassment.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142536
06 Feb 23
@mghrn55 saidwhen helsinki starts sending balloons you holler…k
@Mott-The-Hoople
A comprised President is Trump having his head up Putin's rear end in Helsinki.
Whine all you want. Helsinki isn't going away. 😉
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142536
06 Feb 23
1 edit
@no1marauder saidthe official will not put his name to it…biden has embarrassed the US in front of the entire world!
LMAO! Well put your trust in Trump and his prior administration figures, sucker.
I have little doubt that a senior DoD official isn't going to just make up such a claim out of thin air; the Pentagon has already offered to brief former officials.
Right wingers never admit error here, but this one is likely to end in embarrassment.
when people lie, as these have done previously with the russia hoax, they lose any credibility…just like you
06 Feb 23
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidIt was a background briefing, but the reporters in the room know who he(she) is. In fact, the question regarding previous balloon incursions was asked by a Fox News reporter.
the official will not put his name to it…biden has embarrassed the US in front of the entire world!
when people lie, as these have done previously with the russia hoax, they lose any credibility…just like you
There was no "Russia hoax"; it was proven beyond any serious doubt that the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election with the object of helping Donald Trump win.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142536
06 Feb 23
@no1marauder said“It was a background briefing, but the reporters in the room know who he(she) is.”
It was a background briefing, but the reporters in the room know who he(she) is. In fact, the question regarding previous balloon incursions was asked by a Fox News reporter.
There was no "Russia hoax"; it was proven beyond any serious doubt that the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election with the object of helping Donald Trump win.
😂
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142536
06 Feb 23
@no1marauder said“There was no "Russia hoax"; it was proven beyond any serious doubt that the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election with the object of helping Donald Trump win.”
It was a background briefing, but the reporters in the room know who he(she) is. In fact, the question regarding previous balloon incursions was asked by a Fox News reporter.
There was no "Russia hoax"; it was proven beyond any serious doubt that the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election with the object of helping Donald Trump win.
😂
06 Feb 23
@mott-the-hoople saidThat you are a brainwashed idiot incapable of thinking for yourself doesn't change the fact that both of those statements are true.
“There was no "Russia hoax"; it was proven beyond any serious doubt that the Russian government meddled in the 2016 election with the object of helping Donald Trump win.”
😂
06 Feb 23
@mott-the-hoople said"Let's go to Jen Griffin, FOX.
“It was a background briefing, but the reporters in the room know who he(she) is.”
😂
Q: Thank you very much. What do you think the target of this balloon was? And has this ever happened before that you've seen either a Chinese surveillance balloon or another country's surveillance balloon over the United States, or is this the first time?
SENIOR DEFENSE OFFICIAL: Yes, so, I mean, it is a surveillance balloon. And not to be -- I'm not trying to be a wiseguy. But the goal is surveillance. And clearly they're trying to fly this -- this balloon over sensitive sites, one of which was just mentioned, to collect information. As I said, we do not judge that it provides significant value added over and above what they can currently collect in other means. But nevertheless, it's something we're watching closely.
Is it the first time. It is not the first time that you had a balloon of this nature cross over the continental United States. It has happened a handful of other times over the past few years, to include before this administration.
It is appearing to hang out for a long period of time this time around, more persistent than in previous instances. So that would be one distinguishing factor. Over."
https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3287204/senior-defense-official-holds-a-background-briefing-on-high-altitude-surveillan/
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142536
06 Feb 23
@no1marauder said“SENIOR DEFENSE OFFICIAL”
"Let's go to Jen Griffin, FOX.
Q: Thank you very much. What do you think the target of this balloon was? And has this ever happened before that you've seen either a Chinese surveillance balloon or another country's surveillance balloon over the United States, or is this the first time?
SENIOR DEFENSE OFFICIAL: Yes, so, I mean, it is a surveillance balloon. And ...[text shortened]... ipt/Article/3287204/senior-defense-official-holds-a-background-briefing-on-high-altitude-surveillan/
anonymous, unnamed, senior official,
that trick has gotten old
06 Feb 23
@mott-the-hoople saidDo you even know what "treason" is?
you do realize if this were to be true, the senior official committed treason.
Try looking in the Constitution.
06 Feb 23
@mott-the-hoople saidStanding in front of a room filled with reporters.
“SENIOR DEFENSE OFFICIAL”
anonymous, unnamed, senior official,
that trick has gotten old
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142536
06 Feb 23
1 edit
@no1marauder saidҤ2381. Treason
Do you even know what "treason" is?
Try looking in the Constitution.
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
Usurping the chain of command to aid china is treason