bombshell witness

bombshell witness

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9612
03 Jul 22
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
a “committe” where one side gets to pick ALL members…yes you are lying

dictator pelosi
McCarthy pulled his picks. It was his decision. He did it publicly and deliberately so that you could make this argument when the time came.

He had other choices, and his choice has been roundly criticized by Trump and others. They had an opportunity to add more Republicans to the committee, but they wanted to retain the ability to claim the committee was partisan.

Facts. Logic. Sworn testimony. It's clear what was going on.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53267
03 Jul 22

@Mott-The-Hoople
You mean losing because she chose protection of constitution over party? What a BITCH.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142863
04 Jul 22

@wildgrass said
McCarthy pulled his picks. It was his decision. He did it publicly and deliberately so that you could make this argument when the time came.

He had other choices, and his choice has been roundly criticized by Trump and others. They had an opportunity to add more Republicans to the committee, but they wanted to retain the ability to claim the committee was partisan.

Facts. Logic. Sworn testimony. It's clear what was going on.
as long as pelosi APPROVED his choices. But you know that. The show is backfiring on them, no one cares.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37175
04 Jul 22
1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
as long as pelosi APPROVED his choices. But you know that. The show is backfiring on them, no one cares.
BUT HE DID NOT GIVE HER ANY CHOICES TO APPROVE DID HE SO YOUR LYING LIKE EVERY TRUMPIAN REPUBLICANT EVER.
McCarthy was too busy logging in his pants in case he upset the republican war lord otherwise known as The Donald.
It really does not matter what you think or what lies you tell this is about getting the truth out to swing voters and moderate ( non fascistic) republicans.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53267
04 Jul 22

@AverageJoe1
Sure we can write about the Biden win by 7 million votes but the tone of your post suggests you still believe the big lie. Go on, you can admit it, your reputation won't suffer any more than it has.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53267
04 Jul 22

@Mott-The-Hoople
Your reading comprehension is on the way low side, you just questioned him for saying those taking the fifth don't lie which is exactly what he said but then you come back with yet another stupidism.

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9612
04 Jul 22

@mott-the-hoople said
as long as pelosi APPROVED his choices. But you know that. The show is backfiring on them, no one cares.
He didn't nominate anyone.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142863
04 Jul 22

@kevcvs57 said
BUT HE DID NOT GIVE HER ANY CHOICES TO APPROVE DID HE SO YOUR LYING LIKE EVERY TRUMPIAN REPUBLICANT EVER.
McCarthy was too busy logging in his pants in case he upset the republican war lord otherwise known as The Donald.
It really does not matter what you think or what lies you tell this is about getting the truth out to swing voters and moderate ( non fascistic) republicans.
yes she did deny McCarthys pics…you people are dumb as rocks

https://www.businessinsider.com/pelosi-rejects-2-of-mccarthy-picks-for-january-6-committee-2021-7

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142863
04 Jul 22
1 edit

@wildgrass said
He didn't nominate anyone.
who said he nominated anyone? it is precedent that the majority picks their members and the minority pics theirs.

it is not a “nomination” event.

It is unprecedented that the majority has complete control…you are defending a dictator

w

Joined
20 Oct 06
Moves
9612
04 Jul 22

@mott-the-hoople said
who said he nominated anyone? it is precedent that the majority picks their members and the minority pics theirs.

it is not a “nomination” event.

It is unprecedented that the majority has complete control…you are defending a dictator
Unprecedented use of the word unprecedented.

Complete control we'd have a ban on guns, a wealth tax, an infrastructure plan, free health care, much higher taxes, and a bunch of kids running around with a $100,000 check to pay for their tuition at Harvard.

We're definitely not there yet - thankfully.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142863
04 Jul 22

@wildgrass said
Unprecedented use of the word unprecedented.

Complete control we'd have a ban on guns, a wealth tax, an infrastructure plan, free health care, much higher taxes, and a bunch of kids running around with a $100,000 check to pay for their tuition at Harvard.

We're definitely not there yet - thankfully.
just a few days ago you were real big on that word 😂

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53267
04 Jul 22
1 edit

@Mott-The-Hoople
Yeah, you HATE laws that allow help for real people, hey why not allow TEN year olds to purchase an AR15, that way even GRADE school kids can kill in their classrooms.
OMG, TAX the rich, how disgusting can you get. Or that STUPID EPA with all their rules not allowing shyte companies dumping toxins in rivers we drink from, those BASTURDS.
Yep, those democrats are SO wrong.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142863
06 Jul 22

@kevcvs57 said
BUT HE DID NOT GIVE HER ANY CHOICES TO APPROVE DID HE SO YOUR LYING LIKE EVERY TRUMPIAN REPUBLICANT EVER.
McCarthy was too busy logging in his pants in case he upset the republican war lord otherwise known as The Donald.
It really does not matter what you think or what lies you tell this is about getting the truth out to swing voters and moderate ( non fascistic) republicans.
read this you pos liar...

https://www.businessinsider.com/pelosi-rejects-2-of-mccarthy-picks-for-january-6-committee-2021-7

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
06 Jul 22

@mott-the-hoople said
read this you pos liar...

https://www.businessinsider.com/pelosi-rejects-2-of-mccarthy-picks-for-january-6-committee-2021-7
McCarthy wanted to put on an investigative committee two members who were sure to be among those investigated because they had been in direct contact with Trump's aides immediately before, during and after the events of January 6th. Pelosi obviously refused such an absurd request while accepting four other recommended Republicans and invited McCarthy to replace the members who would have been investigated. McCarthy refused to do so and the accepted Republicans refused to serve.

This was a fairly transparent bad faith tactic by Republicans terrified of offending the Donald.

Joined
05 Nov 06
Moves
142863
06 Jul 22

@no1marauder said
McCarthy wanted to put on an investigative committee two members who were sure to be among those investigated because they had been in direct contact with Trump's aides immediately before, during and after the events of January 6th. Pelosi obviously refused such an absurd request while accepting four other recommended Republicans and invited McCarthy to replace the member ...[text shortened]...

This was a fairly transparent bad faith tactic by Republicans terrified of offending the Donald.
Pelosi should be eliminated because she played the most important part on jan 6 by refusing police and national guard that Trump had requested… to follow your line of thought.

The people see this for what it is, no amount of liberal freaks shouting oh its legitimate will change this.

The most concerns with the public is gas, inflation and just trying to survive…as recent polls show. And no one is interested in the dems freak show.
Its all they have left and it is failing miserably.