08 Jan '21 14:07>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedThat's a slightly different issue, of course. Rejecting a vaccine because one of its ingredients might violate a religious taboo is no more "anti-vax" than refuse to consume pork products on religious grounds is "anti-eating".
@eladar saidYou would think, Eladar, that after winning the RHP personality of the year award for your utter stupidity on the matter of corona, you’d wisely shut up, get vaccinated and never dare mention the bloody virus again.
A quote from something I read on line.
in Cordoba, Spain, randomized 76 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive either open-label calcifediol or no supplementation, in addition to standard care. The intervention group received 1,064 μg of this fast-acting vitamin D analogue in the first week three times more potent than vitamin D3, followed by 266 μg weekly ...[text shortened]... really need.
Oh, but what government official or member of big pharm can get rich with vitamin d?
@kewpie saidHow on earth can someone so ignorant not know that technology exists and how it works and pretend to know what they are talking about?
How on earth can someone so ignorant hold a pharmacist certification?
@shavixmir saidThey don't want to be human Guinea Pigs and you don't understand that. Get the vaccine as soon as possible then. Show your peers what a man you are.
25% of Dutch people don't want the vaccination.
One has to despair, I think.
@metal-brain saidYeah your rambling in pidgin English again MB what are you trying to post?
How on earth can someone so ignorant not know that technology exists and how it works and pretend to know what they are talking about?
@kevcvs57 saidFACEBOOK WILL NOW BAN FACTS ABOUT VACCINE INGREDIENTS! WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW!!!
Yeah your rambling in pidgin English again MB what are you trying to post?
@great-king-rat saidSo you are saying the study is fake? I just did not have the link. If you want to see the link, go find it in the science forum topic I started on the topic.
And here then lies the heart of the problem.