21 Jan 10
Originally posted by generalissimo"guilty until proven innocent" is not the same as "detained until proven innocent", which all or most countries do for those accused of serious crimes, and which is what you are whinging on about.
so now the US went from "innocent until proven guilty" to "guilty until proven innocent"?
22 Jan 10
Originally posted by zeeblebotIm not denying that suspected terrorists (with evidence to believe they're indeed a potential threat) should be detained, but like I said it is a well-known fact that the US allowed abuse to happen and detained people who weren't a threat.
"guilty until proven innocent" is not the same as "detained until proven innocent", which all or most countries do for those accused of serious crimes, and which is what you are whinging on about.