Clans
28 Jun 18
Originally posted by @roma45Well as you have proven with your inability to work out a table from time gone by
Yep that sums you up to almost perfection you missed out idiotic though.
We finally agree.
Now please tell what is actually wrong with the current system?
Sorry but failing to understand it and calling it rubbish are not acceptable answers.
You still can't get past stage one. poor tadger has not got a clue.
The current table is ........well rubbish there is no other way to put it
Mind you as your a moron with out any mathematical ability It doesn't surprise me that you can't see that
Originally posted by @padgerYou have not shown what is wrong with the current system.
Well as you have proven with your inability to work out a table from time gone by
The current table is ........well rubbish there is no other way to put it
Mind you as your a moron with out any mathematical ability It doesn't surprise me that you can't see that
Wow thumbing me down faster than you timeout...only in tournament games though.
Come on tadger explain why the current system is rubbish?
Then just explain why your system is better.
Then finally convince enough players to support it.
Three simple steps thats all you have to do.
Should be easy for a lying bully like you.
Originally posted by @roma45What is wrong as I have pointed out in the past but of course you choose not to take any notice
You have not shown what is wrong with the current system.
Wow thumbing me down faster than you timeout...only in tournament games though.
Come on tadger explain why the current system is rubbish?
Then just explain why your system is better.
Then finally convince enough players to support it.
Three simple steps thats all you have to do.
Should be easy for a lying bully like you.
Tell me how many points this clan should have
24 20 11 211 205 26 114
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @padgerAnd how would your table look given that your crap "idea" was adopted. Say a clan had played and completed 20 challenges of varying sizes and had won and lost by varying amounts.
Well as you have proven with your inability to work out a table from time gone by
The current table is ........well rubbish there is no other way to put it
Mind you as your a moron with out any mathematical ability It doesn't surprise me that you can't see that
Show us how your proposed table would look like.
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @radioactive69I will do that given time
And how would your table look given that your crap "idea" was adopted. Say a clan had played and completed 20 challenges of varying sizes and had won and lost by varying amounts.
Show us how your proposed table would look like.
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @padgerMan, you just don't have the mental acumen to grasp the complexity of the clan system.
What is wrong as I have pointed out in the past but of course you choose not to take any notice
Tell me how many points this clan should have
24 20 11 211 205 26 114
There is no other competition where clans can play any number of challenges they choose with varying amount of players involved in these challenges. One day they may play a challenge with 3 players, the next it might be a challenge with 7 players.
Most people accept the tables as they understand this. A few dumb morons who just simply don't have a clue want to while and mewl about what they don't understand. You are one of those.
The clan system may not be perfect but for the complexity of its makeup Russ has done an outstanding job in making it fair and competitive. I don't expect you to understand this as you are a mental midget.
Keep whining away and we'll keep trying to whack a bit of sense into your thick melon. Lets face it, slapping you around is a bit cruel given your mental handicap but some fools just deserve it.
Please post some more dumb ravings so we can slap you round some more.
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @padgerIt's impossible. You don't think before you post. Come up with a big crap idea but have no backing to prove how it's batter.
I will do that given time
Sorry dude, you should leave the smart stuff to the intellectuals and they will leave the s.hit shovelling to the likes of you.
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @padgerSo give us a breakdown, e.g. for Wycombe. How did you arrive at those totals?
OK that didn't take long because it makes sense
Wycombe Wanderers 113 92 117 581 540 94 920
Metallica 101 40 35 594 443 109 897
Sizzle 135 114 125 388 346 120 793
This based on the current table
P.s. I can't be bothered rereading your ludicrous idea.
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @padgerAsk russ i am not wasting my time explaining it to the site bully again.
What is wrong as I have pointed out in the past but of course you choose not to take any notice
Tell me how many points this clan should have
24 20 11 211 205 26 114
Its up to you to prove how useless the current system is if you want support and change.
I even gave you three stages to follow. so far its been an embarrassing failure.
The angry bully has surfaced
Your or you're ?
There or their?
Yep the tadger does not have a clue.
06 Sep 18
Originally posted by @radioactive69Well lets face it you never read it in the first place
So give us a breakdown, e.g. for Wycombe. How did you arrive at those totals?
P.s. I can't be bothered rereading your ludicrous idea.
You just agreed with your bully captain
Quite simple Challenges won * 3 + games won