Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

The person who posts most frequently is the one most likely to make the closing post.

Originally posted by DeepThought
The person who posts most frequently is the one most likely to make the closing post.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

Originally posted by RJHinds
My spectacular posts are only a fail to those that don't like what I have to say. Others consider them spectacular successes.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
statistically yes, never the less, are you saying this accounts for Hinds thread killing spree? May I offer an alternative hypothesis? He is talking pure one hundred percent unadulterated hyper concentrated pants!

Originally posted by DeepThought
Quantity is often a compromiser of quality.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Why do so many threads end with either
a spectacular "fail" from RJHinds
or
an unanswered question from an atheist.

Why?

Right, hands up everybody who falls into the "Others consider them spectacular successes" category.

Any takers?