18 Mar 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobWhy haven't you checked the last 20 games of at least the top 10 players on
My bias? I've ran a 20 game batch of another RHP player, gambit05 who incidentally is a 2200+ rated player who isn't cheating, and i'm running a batch on a third. You can see gambit05's results in the chess forum if you like. That's what a non cheating chess player's results looks like.
the rating list and post the detailed result like you did for me if there was no bias here?
18 Mar 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsWhy are you so concerned with your first 20 games? He ran your last 20 games that had 20 moves out of book. Seems pretty cut and dry to me. You are treating cheating lke you argue your faith... with circular arguments. Give it a rest and own it.
I bet you never ran my first twenty games in a batch. You pick and choose who
and what games to run in your batches and then evaluate the results all in a
biased manner IMO. You are also just as biased in evaluating the evidence for
and against atheism vs. theism and evolution vs. intelligent design or creation.
18 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsI bet you never ran my first twenty games in a batch.
I bet you never ran my first twenty games in a batch. You pick and choose who
and what games to run in your batches and then evaluate the results all in a
biased manner IMO. You are also just as biased in evaluating the evidence for
and against atheism vs. theism and evolution vs. intelligent design or creation.
The criteria is 20 games against 2000+ rated players, you played no one of that strength during that period.
You pick and choose who and what games to run in your batches and then evaluate the results all in a biased manner IMO.
Three people, all independent of each other, have ran a batch of your games and we have all came up with nearly identical results. Explain that if i'm supposed to be biased.
18 Mar 12
Originally posted by usmc7257I just do not like being singled out by someone that has a bias against me
Why are you so concerned with your first 20 games? He ran your last 20 games that had 20 moves out of book. Seems pretty cut and dry to me. You are treating cheating lke you argue your faith... with circular arguments. Give it a rest and own it.
because I challenge the validity of his belief in evolution in support of his
atheism. The evalustion process is also suspect and not cut and dry as you
think. It was even mentioned by someone else on the Chess Forum that it
appeared flawed. We need a fair and unflawed system to find someone
guilty of cheating. This is far from being unflawed and fair.
19 Mar 12
Originally posted by divegeesterShame on you, divegeester!
So not about being born into a cult then. You don't think he's at all worried about having no way out without being disowned by his parents and having to live with the emotional stress of having walked away?
ðŸ˜
Here is a child in need of help at best, and sympathy at the very least!
Are you saying that children of atheists, Hindus, Vegans or whatever you espouse do NOT have nightmares and problems which demand our support??!
Again, shame on you for hitting a hurting parent when they are down!
😛
21 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsWhy do you presume to know what I think about the evaluation process? The sad thing is that you think that you are being questioned for cheating because of your faith. I could try to convince you otherwise, but I'm afraid it would fall on deaf ears
I just do not like being singled out by someone that has a bias against me
because I challenge the validity of his belief in evolution in support of his
atheism. The evalustion process is also suspect and not cut and dry as you
think. It was even mentioned by someone else on the Chess Forum that it
appeared flawed. We need a fair and unflawed system to find someone
guilty of cheating. This is far from being unflawed and fair.
