- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
07 Mar 16
Originally posted by googlefudgeI'm down to the part about Straw Vulcan.
I'm waiting.
So far I see you unhappy that Craig refers to some writers and artists in their opinions.
This you complain it Argument from Authority.
I simply see him referring to people who share an opinion.
If you complain about every "This person said this ...." as an argument from Authority, I don't know how you can simply refer to anyone.
I'd have to read the words of Craig again and see if he is really saying "Because so-and-so said thus and such, it has to be true."
I take it as supporting agreement with a view. That's fair.
07 Mar 16
Originally posted by josephwRead your own posts carefully. There isn't much difference between those two statements. And both are false.
Read my post carefully. I didn't say the Bible was all about Jesus.
But all of the Bible is about Jesus Christ.
The point I was making originally was that the Bible isn't about Paul or John.
But it does contain theology from both Paul and John. And some Christians seem to prefer Pauls theology over Johns.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
08 Mar 16
1 edit
But all of the Bible is about Jesus Christ.
So true.
Whatever promises of God there are, in Him [Christ] is the Yes and Amen to God.
2 Corinthians 1:20-22Darby Translation (DARBY)
20 For whatever promises of God [there are], in him is the yea, and in him the amen, for glory to God by us.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
08 Mar 16
Paul and John ministered the same thing. They used different words and phrases.
We speak of Paul's tent making ministry and John's mending ministry.
The former prepared the church life.
The latter was a ministry of repair to bring the believers back to the beginning.
This was like the mending of broken nets for fishing.
- Joined
- 31 May 06
- Moves
- 1795
Originally posted by sonshipThen you are very bad at reading. Because the 'Straw Vulcan' part is at least the 6th fallacy I accuse him of.
I'm down to the part about Straw Vulcan.
So far I see you unhappy that Craig refers to some writers and artists in their opinions.
This you complain it Argument from Authority.
I simply see him referring to people who share an opinion.
If you complain about every "This person said this ...." as an argument from Authority, I don't know how you c ...[text shortened]... s and such, it has to be true."
I take it as supporting agreement with a view. That's fair.
If you have got that far and only spotted one [and failed to understand even that] then your comprehension
is so bad this may be utterly pointless.
EDIT: Thread for convenience
http://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/spirituality/william-lane-craig-deconstructed-at-lengh.145003
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by twhiteheadYou've got a real nerve. Since when have you responded to my requests like this ?
Give your two favourite arguments presented in those two youtube videos that you believe successfully debunk Richard Carrier.
My favorite debunkings of Richard Carrier are my own debunkings of him.