@chaney3 saidThis is just to start.
They cannot discuss origin of life.
They cannot explain emotions.
They cannot explain why food exists.
They cannot explain why humans get hungry and tons of food exist.
They cannot explain love.
Atheists exists in a dumb world.
Science cannot fully explain the human digestive system, nor the anal cavity.
@kazetnagorra saidWhat can you explain?
What does it mean to "fully" explain something?
Not much.
19 Nov 18
@divegeester saidC3 wins debate, no problem.
C3 vs KN
Popcorn munching mode activated.
Put away popcorn.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116967
@wolfgang59 saidI recently came across the word "pecksniffian" when considering chaney3's odd attitude to his "Christianity" [sic] and his interactions with the other members of this community.
@chaney3
Dunning-Kruger
20 Nov 18
@divegeester saidGreat word!
I recently came across the word "pecksniffian" when considering chaney3's odd attitude to his "Christianity" [sic] and his interactions with the other members of this community.
(thanks google)
Sounds like a noun .. but isn't ... pity!
20 Nov 18
@chaney3 saidFace it, any life that formed 'by magic' would likely have not survived, unless that life form came to be in an adult state.
Origin of life? Anyone?
You may disagree with the version in Genesis, but you have nothing else to offer.
The chicken or egg hypothesis rings true here, because the egg and what it produced would not have survived.
Only a 'created' adult species could have survived the elements.
"Survival of the fittest" is a generic term, because anything in an infant state needs help to survive.