Originally posted by Proper KnobI did, I had a detailed discussion of why it was not genocide but a judicial execution. I even provided references to the Amekalites and how they fomented war. My position has not changed. Why that should be difficult for you to accept I cannot say.
No you didn't, you hid behind your 'I'm not offering any personal comments' jive.
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieStrange really, coming from man who claimed to able to evaluate the evidence with his own mind. Now you seem to be unable to think for yourself and offer an opinion. I guess that's what being closed minded and ignorant does to someone. 😀
I agree with nothing, I deny nothing and I assume nothing.
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by Proper Knobwhatever rocks your world PK.
Strange really, coming from man who claimed to able to evaluate the evidence with his own mind. Now you seem to be unable to think for yourself and offer an opinion. I guess that's what being closed minded and ignorant does to someone. 😀
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe also agreed on a definition of genocide, I then asked if the actions of the Isarelites fitted this description we agreed upon and I was met with your 'I'm not offering a personal opinion' jive. Basically, you bottled it, which lets be honest, is nothing new.
I did, I had a detailed discussion of why it was not genocide but a judicial execution. I even provided references to the Amekalites and how they fomented war. My position has not changed. Why that should be difficult for you to accept I cannot say.
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by Proper KnobFine whatever.
We also agreed on a definition of genocide, I then asked if the actions of the Isarelites fitted this description we agreed upon and I was met with your 'I'm not offering a personal opinion' jive. Basically, you bottled it, which lets be honest, is nothing new.
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOut of curiosity, when you used to claim you 'evaluated the evidence with your own mind' but then had admit you did nothing of the sort and were in fact 'closed minded'and 'ignorant', which you would never deny. Why were you lying?
whatever rocks your world PK.
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by Proper Knoblying, no i think i was being sarcastic
Out of curiosity, when you used to claim you 'evaluated the evidence with your own mind' but then had admit you did nothing of the sort and were in fact 'closed minded'and 'ignorant', which you would never deny. Why were you lying?
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by Proper KnobI stated that I thought the action fomented by the Amekalites was war and the response was judicial execution, if that appears to you to be a lie, then so be it, far from me to argue with your delusions.
Don't claim you explained when you actually do nothing of the sort. That's called lying.
Originally posted by Proper Knobif you say so then it must be true. Obviously you know what I meant better than I did myself. In fact you know it better to such an extent that you can simply make up anything you like and say that's what I was really thinking.
Now you're lying about your lying.
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI edited my text, lying was a tad harsh.
I stated that I thought the action fomented by the Amekalites was war and the response was judicial execution, if that appears to you to be a lie, then so be it, far from me to argue with your delusions.
So your inability to answer a straight forward question is down to my apparent delusions. I see............😕
10 Jun 15
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThere was no sarcasm involved, you know and I know it. Quit with this silly pretence.
if you say so then it must be true. Obviously you know what I meant better than I did myself. In fact you know it better to such an extent that you can simply make up anything you like and say that's what I was really thinking.