29 Apr 12
Originally posted by humyYou don't [b]konwwhat I know, old man.
I think he has a clue. The words “a load of crap” just might come to his mind when trying to describe what he thinks you “know” -a bit like your spelling of the word "konw" above.[/b]That is a typing error, not a spelling error.
29 Apr 12
Originally posted by VoidSpiritI believe the proven version of history as recorded in the Holy Bible. No one has been able to disprove it. You are too ignorant and stupid to do so. It is you that believes the lie. I believe the truth. I believe in the ONE who is the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏
your knowledge is a faulty copy of the real story.
what really happened is that the god ea wanted mankind to survive the coming flood so he approached utnapishtim and instructed him to build an ark on which to bring the seed of all living creatures. he was then taken to the mouth of the rivers and granted immortality.
then the savage hebrews ...[text shortened]... from their primitive point of view. this is what you believe. the wrong version of the story.
30 Apr 12
Originally posted by RJHindsSo his final word:
You have dismissed this scientific fact.
Intelligent Design in biology.
http://www.arn.org/idfaq/How%20does%20intelligent%20design%20apply%20to%20biology.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToAQJH2EGJ4
Is this a designed system? It looks like it. But the main point is that specified complexity gives us a standard to guide our research.
That's all he can say. "It LOOKS like it". Now THERE is a scientific argument for you.
Something you no doubt can dig your teeth into and produce a Phd thesis paper with peer reviews on.
30 Apr 12
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieAny evidence that fits in with the time frame of the 6 or so thousand years that the bibles covers -Halleluyah!! God bless Jesus ! I mean : Jesus Bless Himself!! Halleluyah!
as evolution is an extremely slow process of almost unnoticeable changes what kind of evidence do you require?
30 Apr 12
Originally posted by RJHindsLol!!!
Yes he put little ones. I though I already covered that. Maybe It was googlefudge I told instead of you. Do you remember me saying something about the gila monster?
Classic stuff you guys ...Awwww- I got a tear in my eye. (Well no- not really)
Dont forget the komodo dragon Ron, 😉 ....hihihiihihi😀
30 Apr 12
Originally posted by RJHindsYeah, thats where it seems to break down for most of us -if I have it right that is,
Perhaps there were a couple big ones too. The Holy Bible does not give a detailed list of all the animals that came onto the boat. You will just have to imagine how that will work best for your understanding. We just know it happened. HalleluYah !!!
We just cant IMAGINE how the hell all those animals could've co-existed let alone survived the whole month together and came out intact and alive without not even one fatality.( oh geez, listen to me, haven't we all been down this path so many times before 😞 ? )
30 Apr 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsHow bloody rude!!
You don't konw what I know, old man.
P.S. I will respect your opinion on those things you know something about and it is not what I know, evolution, and the Holy Bible.
Sonhouse's posts speak for themselves. I would've thought they were above such gutteral put-downs , such as the one you just dished out!
C'mon Ron, that is just a reflection on yourself and not on sonhouse - and you should know that!
30 Apr 12
Originally posted by karoly aczelWhat can I say, I'm just old man being ugly to another old man.
How bloody rude!!
Sonhouse's posts speak for themselves. I would've thought they were above such gutteral put-downs , such as the one you just dished out!
C'mon Ron, that is just a reflection on yourself and not on sonhouse - and you should know that!
I apologize if I was being too rude. I thought that is the way we debate things around here. It is nothing personal. In fact I like his spunk for standing up for what he believes, even if he is wrong. However, he may be better educated than me in some areas of science, he falls way short in his knowledge of the Holy Bible. And when someone claims science as a source of their belief that contradicts the Holy Bible, they better know the Holy Bible as well, if they plan on convincing me.
30 Apr 12
Originally posted by RJHindsWell , thanks for the explanation.
What can I say, I'm just old man being ugly to another old man.
I apologize if I was being too rude. I thought that is the way we debate things around here. It is nothing personal. In fact I like his spunk for standing up for what he believes, even if he is wrong. However, he may be better educated than me in some areas of science, he falls way short in ...[text shortened]... radicts the Holy Bible, they better know the Holy Bible as well, if they plan on convincing me.
Judging my your posts , there is no doubt that he has a better understanding of science than you. You should start with that when discussing his (sonhouse's) posts.
The fact that you dont mind being agist is fine by me, but when I get to that age ,(65-70) , I'm going to lap up all the respect that goes with that age and not be agist any respect , as I believe that our elder generation should be respected- by their peers or by an other people - because those b people have living memory of that which has come before, in our life times. And that is so much underrated so many times in our society, where it should be venerated and held up high as the traditions of so many civilized societies of the past have shown.
ie: the Australian aboriginies have always payed a high respect to their elders as the spokespeople for their generations that have come before and have passed on the oral histories to the "laws of their lands"
30 Apr 12
Originally posted by karoly aczelThis is the Spirituality Forum not the Science Forum. The emphasis should be on spirituality and religion in my opinion. I don't post on the Science Forum anymore. I know something about science, but it is not my strong point.
Well , thanks for the explanation.
Judging my your posts , there is no doubt that he has a better understanding of science than you. You should start with that when discussing his (sonhouse's) posts.
The fact that you dont mind being agist is fine by me, but when I get to that age ,(65-70) , I'm going to lap up all the respect that goes with that ...[text shortened]... ons that have come before and have passed on the oral histories to the "laws of their lands"