05 Oct '05 14:34>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
Originally posted by sasquatch672From what I see there, I'd have to say that these people have a very unhealthy view of the human body and sexuality. This is not atypical among fundamentalists of many persuasions. The body is a fallen entity, a carnal temptation into all sorts of depravity. Sure, they'll respond with the customary "God made sex good," but this refers only to sex/body images that occur within the explicit context of a husband-wife relationship. Further such images/ideas must not discussed in public other than to affirm that sex between a husband and a wife is good, and certainly nothing explicitly or implicitly sexual/carnal should ever be SEEN! This leads to all sorts of wickedness.
Not sure if I'm going to get the range of opinions I'm looking for in the debates forum, so I repeated the thread here. While this is not strictly a "spirituality" thread, I figured I'd get a little traction here. I apologize in advance for anyone judging this out of place.
So apparently there's a Victoria's Secret store in D.C. that has a di ...[text shortened]... me here, or am I just nuts? I could not abide this kind of attitude in a mate for five minutes.
Originally posted by sasquatch672These people obviously have never been on the internet.
Not sure if I'm going to get the range of opinions I'm looking for in the debates forum, so I repeated the thread here. While this is not strictly a "spirituality" thread, I figured I'd get a little traction here. I apologize in advance for anyone judging this out of place.
So apparently there's a Victoria's Secret store in D.C. that has a di ...[text shortened]... me here, or am I just nuts? I could not abide this kind of attitude in a mate for five minutes.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Aren't you familiar with this century-old trick ?
I don't understand your point. What do you mean?