Originally posted by sumydidDefine what you mean by "missing link" so that we are all on the same page.
I think we're done here.
So suddenly, according to the great twite head, the "missing link" was never missing at all. Well great, then I'll just take a trip to the local zoo and ask the gorilla behind the bars, what the meaning of life is.
Whether you genuinely don't understand what I'm saying, or you're faking it just to be difficult... either way there's no point in wasting my time.
Originally posted by stokerYou can not speed read the Holy Bible and really understand it. It requires study like a school testbook. For example, Algebra, Chemistry, or English grammar. You do not hurry through those types of books, if you really want to learn something.
4 TIMES my friend, and other books
Originally posted by RJHindsYou have to read it like a true Scotsman.
You can not speed read the Holy Bible and really understand it. It requires study like a school testbook. For example, Algebra, Chemistry, or English grammar. You do not hurry through those types of books, if you really want to learn something.
Originally posted by RJHindsafter 50 + years i can never speed read, i study slowly too slowly
You can not speed read the Holy Bible and really understand it. It requires study like a school testbook. For example, Algebra, Chemistry, or English grammar. You do not hurry through those types of books, if you really want to learn something.
Originally posted by Rank outsiderOne day we will have a little algorithm on this forum that can automatically flag faulty arguments. So the moment someone posts it might say 'Strawman', or 'Argument from authority' etc.
Maybe he should use a computer to speed up the process to finding the right answers?
The only problem is the theists would leave.
Originally posted by twhiteheadthe whole forum points out how faulty rjhinds' or dasa's arguments are. a 10 year old can see that. pointing faults in someone's argument doesn't make them leave. what internet do you go to usually?
One day we will have a little algorithm on this forum that can automatically flag faulty arguments. So the moment someone posts it might say 'Strawman', or 'Argument from authority' etc.
The only problem is the theists would leave.
i also take offence on the implication that all theists are in the same bowl as the likes of rj and dasa.
Originally posted by ZahlanziFor some odd reason they think they are getting away with it or something. I was just hoping they might react differently if the computer spotted their errors straight off. I wonder if we had more arguments over spelling before the advent of spell checkers. I guess there were always dictionaries.
the whole forum points out how faulty rjhinds' or dasa's arguments are. a 10 year old can see that. pointing faults in someone's argument doesn't make them leave.
i also take offence on the implication that all theists are in the same bowl as the likes of rj and dasa.
Sorry, I apologize for that. I certainly didn't mean to imply that you were as bad as them. I honestly do not recall you using strawman arguments or arguments from authority, so I was wrong to over generalize like that.
I must also admit that atheists are not always perfect with their arguments either (I know I'm not).
So lets just say about half the theists (who we know regularly use faulty arguments) would be affected. Of course they would probably just deny deny deny as they do now.
Originally posted by ZahlanziHey, I know you are not in the same camp as the famous big three of ignorance and bigotry and dogma of the RJ/Kelly/sonship clade. You have reasoned arguments coming from your own mind. That three.....
the whole forum points out how faulty rjhinds' or dasa's arguments are. a 10 year old can see that. pointing faults in someone's argument doesn't make them leave. what internet do you go to usually?
i also take offence on the implication that all theists are in the same bowl as the likes of rj and dasa.