Originally posted by twhiteheadPlease do tell how you can be sure that God doesn't exist?
I don't fully understand b. Is there still some way to positively know that God exists? For example I am sure that by taking the right drugs I could achieve:
"You would feel loved by him and be able to love back. You would experience the joy of communing with him."
without actually believing in his existence.
If you experience all the things you ment ...[text shortened]... hing to do with reality? Do you believe that the benefits of b. exclude the possibility of a?
Originally posted by dj2beckerPresumably all the atheists on this site could do that so don't act surprised.
Please do tell how you can be sure that God doesn't exist?
I have done it before with a whole thread about it though I got bored half way through.
For the purposes of this thread however it was a hypothetical statement and not a claim.
Originally posted by twhiteheadNot all the atheists on this site claim to be strong atheists.
Presumably all the atheists on this site could do that so don't act surprised.
I have done it before with a whole thread about it though I got bored half way through.
For the purposes of this thread however it was a hypothetical statement and not a claim.
And you cannot know for sure that God does not exist because you do not possess absolute knowledge.
Originally posted by dj2beckerActually I can, and I don't require absolute knowledge to do so. But since you either cant understand basic English or simply refuse to do so, I will not bother explaining the more advanced concepts.
And you cannot know for sure that God does not exist because you do not possess absolute knowledge.
Originally posted by twhiteheadIf you say that there is no gold in China, you need to have information that there is no gold in any rock, in any river, in the ground, in any store, in any ring, or in any mouth (gold filling) in China. If there is one speck of gold in China, then your statement is false and you have no basis for it.
Actually I can, and I don't require absolute knowledge to do so. But since you either cant understand basic English or simply refuse to do so, I will not bother explaining the more advanced concepts.
Originally posted by dj2beckerOn the other hand, continued absence of evidence for an orange unicorn living in my refrigerator whenever I look can, I think, be reasonably taken as evidence of absence. I can reasonably say there is no orange unicorn living in my refrigerator. And to the question, “Are you sure?” I can reasonably answer, “Yes.” Even though I have no absolute proof against the existence of unicorns, or what goes on in my refrigerator when I’m not looking...
If you say that there is no gold in China, you need to have information that there is no gold in any rock, in any river, in the ground, in any store, in any ring, or in any mouth (gold filling) in China. If there is one speck of gold in China, then your statement is false and you have no basis for it.
Originally posted by vistesdHaving absolute knowledge about your refrigerator (with the help of spy cameras), and claiming that orange unicorns do not exist in your refrigerator is one thing. But claiming to have absolute knowledge about the entire universe, and claiming that God does not exist, is totally different.
On the other hand, continued absence of evidence for an orange unicorn living in my refrigerator whenever I look can, I think, be reasonably taken as evidence of absence. I can reasonably say there is no orange unicorn living in my refrigerator. And to the question, “Are you sure?” I can reasonably answer, “Yes.” Even though I have no absolute proof against the existence of unicorns, or what goes on in my refrigerator when I’m not looking...
I have yet to meet an atheist who is one because he cannot locate God in his refrigerator! 😀
Originally posted by dj2beckerSpy cameras in all the refrigerators, I say! 😉
Having absolute knowledge about your refrigerator (with the help of spy cameras), and claiming that orange unicorns do not exist in your refrigerator is one thing. But claiming to have absolute knowledge about the entire universe, and claiming that God does not exist, is totally different.
I have yet to meet an atheist who is one because he cannot locate God in his refrigerator! 😀
Originally posted by vistesdNow, I think KM might intend to distinguish between episteme and gnosis. That was the distinction that I assume in my answer regarding my wife. That is, I think that when I say I know my wife, I mean something more than just having a justified true belief in certain propositions about her.VISTED
[b]My main objection (which I see now is off-topic somewhat) is that you were just supposing that this "personal experience" you refer to can produce knowledge (or less stringently, warranted belief)...
The standard caveats: non-dualism, etc., etc.
Now, I think KM might intend to distinguish between episteme and gnosis. That was the ...[text shortened]... nduction I might draw from such experiences, I maintain nondualism, for example, as axiomatic.[/b]
CORRECT
Originally posted by twhiteheadFor example I am sure that by taking the right drugs I could achieve:
I don't fully understand b. Is there still some way to positively know that God exists? For example I am sure that by taking the right drugs I could achieve:
"You would feel loved by him and be able to love back. You would experience the joy of communing with him."
without actually believing in his existence.
If you experience all the things you ment ...[text shortened]... hing to do with reality? Do you believe that the benefits of b. exclude the possibility of a?
"You would feel loved by him and be able to love back. You would experience the joy of communing with him."
without actually believing in his existence.WHITEHEAD
How are you sure? And if you could what would it prove? That drugs can open the way to spiritual experiences? I guarantee that if you had such an experience your beliefs would be questioned.