THE WORD OF GOD

THE WORD OF GOD

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

m

Joined
25 Apr 05
Moves
2089
09 May 05

Originally posted by blindfaith101
GOD has done all that you have said that he should. But what should HE do with those that choose not to believe in HIM?
Jesus said, John 14:11 that if man at that time did not believe in him for who he was, then to believe in him for what he could do,

So now, if people can/do not believe in Jesus for what he is, then surely we need to show them what he can do? and I'm not talking about feeding the poor etc, Muslims do that and I dare say they are doing a better job then us.

What did Elijha do when he needed to prove the existence of God? created two alters poured water on his, and gave the other to the Baal profits and said hey boys lets see whose go's up in flames first? Guess who won?

So please stop quoting scriptures to people who do not believe in the validity of the Bible in the first place, just as you will scoff when a Muslim quotes the koran to you, so will they. Instead, draw closer to God, become what he has called you to be. Get the power, raise the dead, heal the sick and live Jesus on the earth. Then turn to the people and say if you don't believe what I say, believe the works I do!

If you do, then there won't be many that choose not to believe, but until that time prehaps we should stop blaming them for not believing and start blaming ourselves.

C
Not Aleister

Control room

Joined
17 Apr 02
Moves
91813
09 May 05

Originally posted by dj2becker
I see no problem with demos destroying a herd of 'soulless' pigs as opposed to a human being created in Gods image.
What about Babe?
Now that little piggy had soul!

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
09 May 05

Originally posted by blindfaith101
What should HE do with those that choose not to believe in HIM?
I'd ask you the same question... but you seem perfectly content with burning them in Hell's Fires for eternity. How sweet of you.

I got an idea... he could have an open house in Heaven and introduce himself! "Hi, I'm Jesus. Guess what!? I'm the Christ! Surprised? Don't be, it's all good"!

ES

R
Acts 13:48

California

Joined
21 May 03
Moves
227331
09 May 05

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I'd ask you the same question... but you seem perfectly content with burning them in Hell's Fires for eternity. How sweet of you.

I got an idea... he could have an open house in Heaven and introduce himself! "Hi, I'm Jesus. Guess what!? I'm the Christ! Surprised? Don't be, it's all good"!

ES
It is not the pain of fire in hell that will suck for the lost, it is the seperation from God that is more painful.

BWA Soldier

Tha Brotha Hood

Joined
13 Dec 04
Moves
49088
09 May 05

Originally posted by RBHILL
It is not the pain of fire in hell that will suck for the lost, it is the seperation from God that is more painful.
Interesting. If somebody is currently alive and is rejecting God, and is thus separated from God, are you saying that hell will be no worse of a torment for that person than his current life on earth? That is, if people are currently separated from God and feeling just fine, hell is nothing they should fear?

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
10 May 05

Originally posted by RBHILL
It is not the pain of fire in hell that will suck for the lost, it is the seperation from God that is more painful.
For once, I agree with RBHill's theology. 🙂

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
10 May 05

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Interesting. If somebody is currently alive and is rejecting God, and is thus separated from God, are you saying that hell will be no worse of a torment for that person than his current life on earth? That is, if people are currently separated from God and feeling just fine, hell is nothing they should fear?
There is a difference between a person who is alive but separated from God and a person who is dead and separated from God. The person who is alive still enjoys as his frame of existence a world constructed fundamentally to benefit humanity (though it might be damaged by human actions - original sin included) as well as a world and society built upon the actions of those who were not separated from God. When the person is dead, he has no such "reflected grace" to rely upon.

BWA Soldier

Tha Brotha Hood

Joined
13 Dec 04
Moves
49088
10 May 05
2 edits

Originally posted by lucifershammer
There is a difference between a person who is alive but separated from God and a person who is dead and separated from God. The person who is alive still enjoys as his frame of existence a world constructed fundamentally to benefit h ...[text shortened]... person is dead, he has no such "reflected grace" to rely upon.
So, you are saying that the gross amount of torment contributed by separation is the same for a living person and a dead person, but the live person has a lower net torment due to the offsetting effects of the living world that is constructed to benefit humanity. That is, the difference in any net torment is due to the reflected grace; but they both suffer an equivalent gross torment. Is this correct?

l

London

Joined
02 Mar 04
Moves
36105
10 May 05

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
So, you are saying that the gross amount of torment contributed by separation is the same for a living person and a dead person, but the live person has a lower net torment due to the offsetting effects of the living world that is constructed to benefit humanity. That is, the difference in any net torment is due to the reflected grace; but they both suffer an equivalent gross torment. Is this correct?
For the moment, yes. I also suspect that the nature of free will (I believe a dead soul has none) qualitatively changes the torment, as does the sure knowledge of God - but I'll need to think about that aspect.

b

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
97738
10 May 05

Originally posted by mk83
Jesus said, John 14:11 that if man at that time did not believe in him for who he was, then to believe in him for what he could do,

So now, if people can/do not believe in Jesus for what he is, then surely we need to show them what he can do? and I'm not talking about feeding the poor etc, Muslims do that and I dare say they are doing a better job then us. ...[text shortened]... til that time prehaps we should stop blaming them for not believing and start blaming ourselves.
When did Muslims feed the poor more than Christians. Muslims cannot truly say that the BIBLE is false because the Koean testifies of the BIBLE. Their Koran testifies of JESUS CHRIST. True they they donot testify of HIM being The Son Of GOD. which is just one way to show that their's a false faith.You can not say that JESUS CHRIST,is a Good Man, and a Phrophet of god, in one breath. Then say in the next breath kill all those that Believe in HIM. You cannot teach that THE BIBLE is corruptted without giving proof of that corrupttion.Throughout History there has been hate displayed between Muslims and Christians. And to this day Muslims are bent on killing Christians.
I would not be one to say that their are not peaceful Muslims, there are many and I have known some. But their Religion is not one of peace. It does not teach peace. I donot know whether or not that you are saved, or not saved, or a Muslim or not. But you have spoken some thruth, Christian need to do a better job in serving CHRIST.We need to do a better job in spreading the WORD OF GOD. but it is not our fault for what they believe. It is not our fault that their god only speaks Arabic, or you can only pray to him in Arabic. What has been done though is THE WORD OF GOD is written in Arabic, and in just about every speakable tongue on this planet.They now have the same choice as everyone else pick up the Book. They will never be forced to to read THE BIBLE as they force others to read the Koran. They will never be forced to accept JESUS CHRIST as they force others to accept the Koran.
Whether you accept it or not CHRIST died for the sins of all mankind. Whether you accept it or not CHRIST is the SON OF GOD.Whether you accept it or not JESUS CHRIST is GOD. If the Muslim believe that CHRIST was a good man, that HE was a prophet that came from GOD, are they not bound by the Word that HE spoke. To follow what HE said?Just like every Christian? So they donot not follow HIS WORD, but claim that Believe in HIS word. Does that make them just as guilty as all unbelievers? What excuse do they really have? None!

b

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
97738
10 May 05

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I'd ask you the same question... but you seem perfectly content with burning them in Hell's Fires for eternity. How sweet of you.

I got an idea... he could have an open house in Heaven and introduce himself! "Hi, I'm Jesus. Guess what!? I'm the Christ! Surprised? Don't be, it's all good"!

ES
Nowhere in GOD'S WORD, does it say that the created purpose of Mankind was to be Hell bound. In fact you can not get into Hell without chooseing to go there. There always has been an an open house in heaven through JESUS CHRIST. Without HIM you cannot get there. So you are right it is all good.

b

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
97738
10 May 05

Originally posted by RBHILL
It is not the pain of fire in hell that will suck for the lost, it is the seperation from God that is more painful.
VERY TRUE, THE THRUTH IS SPOKEN

b

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
97738
10 May 05

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Interesting. If somebody is currently alive and is rejecting God, and is thus separated from God, are you saying that hell will be no worse of a torment for that person than his current life on earth? That is, if people are currently separated from God and feeling just fine, hell is nothing they should fear?
It will be worse, much worse. But not as worse as the one who once accepted then rejected CHRIST.

S

Joined
19 Nov 03
Moves
31382
10 May 05

Originally posted by blindfaith101
It will be worse, much worse. But not as worse as the one who once accepted then rejected CHRIST.
How does someone accept Jesus and thenreject him? Surely either they didn't accept him in the first place, or Jesus isn't doing his job properly.

m

Joined
25 Apr 05
Moves
2089
10 May 05

Originally posted by blindfaith101
When did Muslims feed the poor more than Christians....

Well, I happen to know a few people who work as missionaries in Africa, and they tell me these things, I also happen to know a few muslims, some involved in feeding schemes, some building hospitals etc. I know of many radio stations that feed the poor and donate to good causes, I also know of many rich men that donate millions to good causes. The fact is if you believe in a true God than show me the power of that God, if your God has no power than either he does not exist, or you do not believe in who you think you believe!


Then say in the next breath kill all those that Believe in HIM.

Can anyone say Crusades? Do you remember when people went around raping and killing in the name of Christ? Please lets no throw any stones for we live in a glass house

You cannot teach that THE BIBLE is corruptted without giving proof of that corrupttion.

Please, you cannot teach that the bible is true, without giving proof of that truth, when they teach you maths do they teach a bunch of stuff and go around disproving it until only one is left, no, they teach you one thing and then show proof of that one thing. So lets teach the Word of God but show proof of it as well.

I donot know whether or not that you are saved, or not saved, or a Muslim or not.

Saved, but lets just say that I have come to the conclusion that I have no right to judge any man or his religion, all I can do is try the best that I can to live Jesus Christ and then let that stand as the truth.

We need to do a better job in spreading the WORD OF GOD. but it is not our fault for what they believe.


You are right, I was harsh in condemning Christians for the state of the world, but you have to agree we have been called to be the light and the salt of the world and I for one am not yet doing the best job that I possibly can, and so yes, I think I need to agree with Paul, that having recieved much grace I have become much of a sinner. More so than those that have recieved less grace.

Whether you accept it or not CHRIST died for the sins of all mankind. Whether you accept it or not CHRIST is the SON OF GOD.Whether you accept it or not JESUS CHRIST is GOD.


Yes he is, now lets prove it to the world through the power of Christ in us, lets live this truth, lets not quote dead scripture, but live Christ daily, bringing light and truth to the world.

So they donot not follow HIS WORD, but claim that Believe in HIS word. Does that make them just as guilty as all unbelievers? What excuse do they really have? None!

I wish not to condemn you, but I think you condemn both of us and all Christians in the above statement, can any but Jesus Christ claim to have truely followed God's word to the letter at all times? The thing is if you live by the law and you fail but one letter of it, you have failed it all.
Jesus said if you truely believe in me you will do what I say, and if you do what I say I will live in you and the father also, to believe in Jesus is more than just to say I believe in Jesus, it is to follow him, to walk with him, to be with him, to live him, every day, every moment every hour. I cannot as yet claim to have that relasionship, but I am happy to carry on by the Grace of God and hope to one day reach the point where his and my spirit are truely one, yes then I can say I believe in Jesus.

blindfaith101 please do not think I am trying to condemn you or anyone by this or any of my other posts, if i have please forgive me, we were called not to condemn but to set free.

MK83