Originally posted by RatX
Keep quiet and people will think you're a fool, open your mouth and prove it.

Or...you could just make a new username and post with that instead.

Originally posted by dj2becker
And you don't seem to notice that you are living in the year 2005[b]AD...[/b]

uh-huh. Actually, depending on who you ask...it's something like 5800 in the Hebrew calendar, and dot-dot-circle-twodash in the Mayan system. Neither here nor there, dj2...your Lord and Saviour is still a myth. Sorry.

Originally posted by David C
Or...you could just make a new username and post with that instead.

Go on with that one, it's really getting somewhere!

Originally posted by dj2becker
Many people believe in Evolution, but I have yet to meet someone who can explain how it happened.

I wasn't talking to you. Besides, I want Nicolaas to elaborate on two of "the truths about God". I can't just accept these truths because he says he agrees with them; I need a little explication...But you'll do just as well--being a teacher in training, maybe you can have a shot at explaining them.

Originally posted by Nemesio
The grammatical 'inconsistency' was in the original Greek and is 'smoothed
out' by fallacious English translations. This is not an 'interpretation:' this is
a fact. Any 'clearing out' you did was done by sticking your head in the sand
and denying that the Greek said what it really and indisputably said.

In other words, you kept insisting that ...[text shortened]... . Certainly, you cannot fault me for my lack of
desire to relent on your absurdity.

Nemesio

I recall that conversation very well. I recall making points and asking questions of you in earnest. I recall you became rather upset at me, thusly prompting me to end our discussion. Such being the case you will have to forgive me if I, and others of like participation and mind in said thread, have yet to accept your assertion. Perhaps we can revisit the issue some time, but I will require far more cordial dialogue than last time and more cordial dialogue than you are expressing currently.

Untill such a time, your continued sermon of allegedly finding two errors of verb tense in a compilation of 256 books will fall utterly short of facillitating impressing any point upon me. It is not my intent to quarrel with you, as we have had many good discussions in the past. My intent is solely to present to you my perception that your presentation of this point in the past was less than admirable and less than convincing.

Best Regards,
Omnislash

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
I wasn't talking to you. Besides, I want Nicolaas to elaborate on two of "the truths about God". I can't just accept these truths because he says he agrees with them; I need a little explication...But you'll do just as well--being a teacher in training, maybe you can have a shot at explaining them.

And Jesus said unto them, "And whom do you say that I am?"
They replied, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground
of our being, the ontological foundation of the context of our very
selfhoodrevealed." And Jesus replied, "What?"

Originally posted by Omnislash
And Jesus said unto them, "And whom do you say that I am?"
They replied, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground
of our being, the ontological foundation of the context of our very
selfhoodrevealed." And Jesus replied, "What?"

Exactly.

Originally posted by Omnislash
And Jesus said unto them, "And whom do you say that I am?"
They replied, "You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground
of our being, the ontological foundation of the context of our very
selfhoodrevealed." And Jesus replied, "What?"

Now that's funny!