- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
24 Nov 18
@thinkofone saidWhen faced with his argument you simply claim that he doesn’t understand rather than refute his argument or demonstrate exactly what it is that he doesn’t understand.
KJ obviously doesn't understand natural selection. It behooves him to understand this fact.
How exactly is trying to help someone to realize that they don't understand something an ad hom?
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
@thinkofone saidStrawman, right on cue.
I understand that you like to think you do , but when you post things like the following, it's clear that you don't.
[quote]I agree, but which came first the cold or the fur? If fur then is there some designer
pushing out next generations required traits before they become necessary? The
ways these things are discussed you'd think there was a plan and purpose behind ...[text shortened]... an He abide in anyone?".
Do you think that this individual actually understands the resurrection?
@dj2becker saidI wasn't trying to "refute his argument".
When faced with his argument you simply claim that he doesn’t understand rather than refute his argument or demonstrate exactly what it is that he doesn’t understand.
I was trying to make KJ aware of the fact that he still doesn't understand natural selection.
Do you ever think anything through?
@dj2becker saidKJ has not put forward an argument.
When faced with his argument you simply claim that he doesn’t understand rather than refute his argument or demonstrate exactly what it is that he doesn’t understand.
He has been asking lots of questions which I have had the
patience to answer. But many of his questions demonstrate
his total lack of basic knowledge and he is asking me to
defend ridiculous ideas which no evolutionist would ever subscribe to.
@dj2becker saidNo understanding of what "ad hominem" means or how to spell cue.
The ad hominem arrives right on que as expected.
24 Nov 18
@dj2becker saidNo understanding of the term "strawman" and still unable to spell cue!
Strawman, right on que.
24 Nov 18
@wolfgang59 saidArgumentum ad ignorantiam, right on queue.
No understanding of the term "strawman" and still unable to spell cue!
24 Nov 18
@thinkofone saidDescribe what my complaints are and why I have them?
About what exactly do you think I have no clue?
If it's whether or not you actually understand natural selection, then prove me wrong:
In your own words explain the underlying concepts of natural selection.
- Joined
- 01 Oct 04
- Moves
- 12095
24 Nov 18
@thinkofone saidAlternatively you don't understand Kelly's question because if you did you would come up with something better than 'you don't understand natural selection'.
Based on your questions it's excruciatingly clear that you still are unable to understand even the basics of natural selection - even though it's been explained and re-explained to you countless times.
@dj2becker saidExplain how and why Jesus had 3 legs.
Alternatively you don't understand Kelly's question because if you did you would come up with something better than 'you don't understand natural selection'.
24 Nov 18
@wolfgang59 saidDid you see me say natural selection does change DNA?
I agree.
Please read my previous posts.
Natural selection DOES NOT change DNA.
Consider this:
when food becomes short do you agree or not agree that taller animals will survive better?
when the climate becomes colder do you agree or not agree that having slightly thicker fur an advantage?
It's just small changes.
Which is why Natural Selection cannot prevent
species going extinct in times of radical change.
24 Nov 18
@kellyjay saidDid you see me say it?
Did you see me say natural selection does change DNA?
It was implied in one of your questions.
Review what you have written.
I thought I was helping you by answering your questions
but it seems your quest for knowledge was not sincere.