25 Feb '21 07:50>
@suzianne saidWasn’t he talking about the gentiles?
Even so, Jesus saying that he has "other sheep" doesn't rule out that we may actually BE the lost sheep.
@suzianne saidWasn’t he talking about the gentiles?
Even so, Jesus saying that he has "other sheep" doesn't rule out that we may actually BE the lost sheep.
@sonship saidThe more we explore the universe the more we will come to realize it contains no deity.
The First Ever Crime Has Just Been Committed In Space
I noticed this in relation to taking out fallen sinful nature with us into outer space.
Going to Mars will have these problems.
I am not saying don't go. I am saying we will take out sinful natures with us wherever we go unless we are transformed in Christ's salvation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82Ug7-_UlsQ&ab_channel=TheInfographicsShow
The more we explore the universe the more we will come to realize it contains no deity.
@sonship saidThe effectiveness of the argument that there is design is limited by Mill’s challenge of the nature of evil and his observation that there exists some things which have no evident purpose. He believes that because natural evil, for example the plague or volcanoes, exist, then if the universe was designed it seems to be a faulty one. Therefore, if there is a designer the designer is morally flawed. Mill’s challenge is effective overall in challenging the existence of God, because it makes no sense that if God existed he would create a universe with natural evil, as he is supposed to be omni-benevolent and omnipotent so able to eliminate natural evil.The more we explore the universe the more we will come to realize it contains no deity.
I believe that the more we gain understanding of the universe the more evidence for its design will become apparent.
Having said that, the stronger some will react in rejection to the obvious.
I don't think any evidence will force people to believe in a Creator.
...[text shortened]... vain in their reasonings, and their heart, lacking understanding, was darkened." (Rom. 1:18-21)[/b]
The effectiveness of the argument that there is design is limited by Mill’s challenge of the nature of evil and his observation that there exists some things which have no evident purpose.
He believes that because natural evil, for example the plague or volcanoes, exist, then if the universe was designed it seems to be a faulty one.
Therefore, if there is a designer the designer is morally flawed.
Mill’s challenge is effective overall in challenging the existence of God, because it makes no sense that if God existed he would create a universe with natural evil, as he is supposed to be omni-benevolent and omnipotent so able to eliminate natural evil.
@sonship saidI don't watch your videos.
Mill’s challenge is effective overall in challenging the existence of God, because it makes no sense that if God existed he would create a universe with natural evil, as he is supposed to be omni-benevolent and omnipotent so able to eliminate natural evil.
Let's get a second opinion on that from William Lane Craig a Christian and trained philosopher.
[ ...[text shortened]... blem of Evil and Suffering[/b]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtx5GyP7i7w&ab_channel=drcraigvideos
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSo says the guy hiding behind "Mill's challenge" and says -
I don't watch your videos.
If you have a valid argument, make it.
@sonship saidFacepalm.
So says the guy hiding behind "Mill's challenge" and says -
Now Go To
https://peped.org/philosophicalinvestigations/essay-there-is-no-design-in-the-universe-discuss-32-40-marks/
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou did nothing that I didn't also do.
Facepalm.
I didn't say 'go there' I provided the source of what I had posted. (Something you frequently fail to do).
William Lane Craig on the Problem of Evil and Suffering
&ab_channel=drcraigvideos
@sonship saidLet's see if you can identify the difference:
You did nothing that I didn't also do.
William Lane Craig on the Problem of Evil and Suffering
&ab_channel=drcraigvideos
Ie. Here's where you can hear more about what I said.