31 Oct 10
Originally posted by twhiteheadListen Twit head....world society you fool.
Yes, I am way too childish to realize that 'atheistic' means 'religious'.
Now I'm guessing this society with 'billions' of people must be either China, or the whole World. Or do you have a definition for 'society' or 'billions' that I am too childish to know?
01 Nov 10
Originally posted by John W BoothCant you understand that the meat eating religions are bogus, and therefore the followers might as well be atheists because they entertain false teachings and behave irreligious....theres not much difference between people who follow false religion and atheists, because they both have no knowledge of the spiritual life and they both slaughter mother cow.
But they are examples of 'theism', not of 'atheism' as you stated.
01 Nov 10
1 edit
Originally posted by ZahlanziHe is a Perpetuum Mobile, he goes, and goes, and goes (*yawn*), and goes ... forever.
are people still entertaining this buffoon?
Doesn't matter if people want to seriously debate with him. He just goes on.
Now he equates christianity with atheism. He is totally in his own world. He better take that pill.
01 Nov 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuYou're missing the point. If they believe in God then they are 'theists'. Your attitude towards their faith or your certainty about your own faith does not change the definitions of the words 'theist' and 'atheist'.
Cant you understand that the meat eating religions are bogus, and therefore the followers might as well be atheists because they entertain false teachings and behave irreligious....theres not much difference between people who follow false religion and atheists, because they both have no knowledge of the spiritual life and they both slaughter mother cow.
01 Nov 10
Originally posted by John W BoothHe changes his own rules as he goes along.
You're missing the point. If they believe in God then they are 'theists'. Your attitude towards their faith or your certainty about your own faith does not change the definitions of the words 'theist' and 'atheist'.
01 Nov 10
Originally posted by John W BoothI know where stuck with semantics here, but their believing in God is artificial because their belief is marred with so much error that what does their theism actually mean....it means their belief is so erroneous that they really arent theists at all, and to be a real theist then one must have real knowledge of the spiritual and not false knowledge.(theres real theism and theres counterfeit theism)
You're missing the point. If they believe in God then they are 'theists'. Your attitude towards their faith or your certainty about your own faith does not change the definitions of the words 'theist' and 'atheist'.
01 Nov 10
Originally posted by vishvahetuNo. We are not "stuck with semantics here". You are not using the words 'theism' and 'atheism' correctly. Whether you think their belief in God (their theism) is "marred" or "artificial" or "erroneous" is not relevant. Neither your contempt for their particular versions of theism nor the strength of your version of theism can change the definitions of the words 'theist' and 'atheist'.
I know where stuck with semantics here, but their believing in God is artificial because their belief is marred with so much error that what does their theism actually mean....it means their belief is so erroneous that they really arent theists at all...
01 Nov 10
2 edits
Originally posted by vishvahetu
I know where stuck with semantics here, but their believing in God is artificial because their belief is marred with so much error that what does their theism actually mean....it means their belief is so erroneous that they really arent theists at all, and to be a real theist then one must have real knowledge of the spiritual and not false knowledge.(theres real theism and theres counterfeit theism)
I redefine "semantics" as "carrots"
You talk about dysfunctional intelligence and false knowledge but...
WTF have carrots got to do with anything vishvahetu??? 😕 Stay on topic please!!! 😞