Originally posted by Proper Knobno you have cited an opinion of why you dont think the Bible demonstrates evidence of inspiration or is at odds with your interpretation of contemporary science.
I've given you evidence for why I reject a literal God.
Dude you cannot give any evidence for the non existence of God, it cannot be done, this is the whole point and why atheism remains a purely unsubstantiated stance.
Originally posted by Proper Knobyeh dude, that's correct, its a fear factor and yet here I am prepared to go head to head with all trusty and valiant atheists who take the field like the all conquering hero that I purport to be!
Too scared to read science books at the age of 44. Cracks me up every time.
Anyhow i need to go to work, last time i got sunburnt.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI have given you reasons based on evidence as to why i believe a literal God of the Bible does not exist. You can of course dismiss it as opinion, you can claim it's based on my interpretation of contemporary science (whatever that means) blah blah blah.
no you have cited an opinion of why you dont think the Bible demonstrates evidence of inspiration or is at odds with your interpretation of contemporary science.
Dude you cannot give any evidence for the non existence of God, it cannot be done, this is the whole point and why atheism remains a purely unsubstantiated stance.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieis it just an opinion that 1+1=2 or is it a fact.
no you have cited an opinion of why you dont think the Bible demonstrates evidence of inspiration or is at odds with your interpretation of contemporary science.
Dude you cannot give any evidence for the non existence of God, it cannot be done, this is the whole point and why atheism remains a purely unsubstantiated stance.
Originally posted by Proper Knobit canny be done dude, you are as religious as me!
I have given you reasons based on evidence as to why i believe a literal God of the Bible does not exist. You can of course dismiss it as opinion, you can claim it's based on my interpretation of contemporary science (whatever that means) blah blah blah.
Originally posted by Proper KnobTo not read books about [unafiliated] science and make claims about Earth origins,etc. is majorly counterintuitive.
Too scared to read science books at the age of 44. Cracks me up every time.
I'm a spiritual person but 75% of my reading is science books. Proper science books as well 🙂
Originally posted by karoly aczeland yet you are prepared to arrogantly state, without the slightest supporting evidence, that there is no God. One can only wonder at what other irrational and unscientific claims you extol without the slightest evidence.
To not read books about [unafiliated] science and make claims about Earth origins,etc. is majorly counterintuitive.
I'm a spiritual person but 75% of my reading is science books. Proper science books as well 🙂