Science or Spirituality?

Science or Spirituality?

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
18 Apr 14

Originally posted by FabianFnas
And when did you learn anything about computers? You've clearly shown that you don't understand much. I remember when you dismissed computer simulations about things.
I hate to tell you that you don't know much of computers and their programming. Either. Sorry about that.
Garbage in, garbage out. That is not a complete dismissal of computer simulations about all things. I was referring to the garbage of evolution.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
18 Apr 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
Garbage in, garbage out. That is not a complete dismissal of computer simulations about all things. I was referring to the garbage of evolution.
Creationism is just a load of garbage. So you say, we cannot expect more than a load of garbage out of it? You are right in that sense.

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
18 Apr 14
1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
The material is not the same, but the principle of operation is similiar. Obviously, the DNA computer is much more complex than the silicon one that I am presently using to communicate with you.

Silicon vs. DNA Microprocessors

Silicon microprocessors have been the heart of the computing world for more than 40 years. In that time, manufacturers have c ...[text shortened]... more complex computer -- the human brain.

http://computer.howstuffworks.com/dna-computer2.htm
"Another drawback of his DNA computer is that it requires human assistance. The goal of
the DNA computing field is to create a device that can work independent of human
involvement."

- from page one in that same article.

Now, ask yourself why that is. Also, ponder this question: Should a DNA computer ever be
built, will it's constituent parts be directly connected, guaranteeing the correct results every
time, or will they be free-floating parts, like in your cells?

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
18 Apr 14
1 edit

Originally posted by C Hess
"Another drawback of his DNA computer is that it requires human assistance. The goal of
the DNA computing field is to create a device that can work independent of human
involvement."

- from page one in that same article.

Now, ask yourself why that is. Also, ponder this question: Should a DNA computer ever be
built, will it's constituent parts ...[text shortened]... eeing the correct results every
time, or will they be free-floating parts, like in your cells?
Jesus might return before anyone makes a DNA computer like that. So I am not going to count on man making a DNA computer. God already did that, anyway, our bodies.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
18 Apr 14

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Creationism is just a load of garbage. So you say, we cannot expect more than a load of garbage out of it? You are right in that sense.
You might consider yourself garbage, but I am a treasure and wonderfully made.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
18 Apr 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
You might consider yourself garbage, but I am a treasure and wonderfully made.
So you think. But you are still ignorant as an evilutionist.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
18 Apr 14
1 edit

Originally posted by FabianFnas
So you think. But you are still ignorant as an evilutionist.
But as a YEC, I am ...

The Near Genius

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
18 Apr 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
Jesus might return before anyone makes a DNA computer like that. So I am not going to count on man making a DNA computer. God already did that, anyway, our bodies.
Whatever.

K

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
2598
18 Apr 14
2 edits

One thing is for sure, science will not get us to God! The best it can do is help us understand more about God. But it will not reveal God Himself to us. When it comes down to the chance for a great eternity, science gives us nothing eternal.

Science cannot explain our individual future after we humanly die, nor our individual past before each of us were born as a human. Why anyone would want to trust science with things that it will not answer, I do not understand. For gaining eternal life directly, science is a waste of our lives. And most certainly, science is not worth our faith in it, for eternity!

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
18 Apr 14

It is all part of a marvelous theory, which is actually nothing more than a grand evolutionary hoax. Experienced scientists denounce it as untrue.

http://evolutionfacts.com/Evolution-handbook/E-H-12a.htm

K

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
2598
21 Apr 14
1 edit

Knowing all knowledge is unnecessary. It is insignificant! If there is God who wants to save us, then we don't need all knowledge anyway.

K

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
2598
21 Apr 14
1 edit

If creation is a load of garbage, then so is innovation. There is no such thing as innovation. Man innovating is hog wash; it doesn't exist. Whoever believes in innovation is mind controlled. Don't let science lead you to believe in innovation.

Don't take this previous paragraph as a joke either. Truthfully, it is a sorry state of mankind when each person in it cannot believe outside of themselves when it comes to God. What a wasted life IF there is no God!

Associated with Patrick Henry is the saying, "Give me liberty, or give me death!" If no one wants eternal liberty, then don't be surprised if you don't get it. Whatever you do, don't think you can blame God if you don't gain liberty in eternity. And whatever you add to that plight, quit trying to take eternal liberty from other human beings.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
21 Apr 14

Originally posted by KingOnPoint
What a wasted life IF there is no God!

Only if you have wasted it believing there is a god.

K

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
2598
21 Apr 14
1 edit

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Only if you have wasted it believing there is a god.
IF there is a God, why doesn't He go ahead and destroy us all and quit wasting His desires and effort towards us with grace and mercy? Why did God of the bible repent that He had made man and still leave Noah, and his wife, sons-in-law, and daughters on the earth?

King James Version
==============
Genesis 6: 7, 8
And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD.

K

Joined
31 Jan 06
Moves
2598
21 Apr 14
1 edit

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Only if you have wasted it believing there is a god.
Wolfgang59 and All Others,
Is it worse to believe in God, if there isn't One, or to not believe in God when there is One who wants to save us?