Richard Dawkins among friends, Bill Maher:

Originally posted by sonhouse
Do you hold hands with your invisible friends?

Originally posted by RJHinds
The article says "possible" ancestors. So it is just a guess like I've said
before. There is no science fact in guessing. Anybody can do that. They
don't know what this imaginary ape ancestor even looks like, no fossil
records to prove any ideas even. This is more evolutionary bull crap.
I though scientist needed hard evidence, not just speculations.

Originally posted by jaywill
[b]=======================================
We have been through this before. No scientist (as far as I am aware) has ever said we evolved from apes.
=====================================

But evolutionists get artists to draw out their theories in pictoral form. And what we see as a near ancestor to humans USUALLY LOOKS LIKE AN APE.

Maybe Evolution is really a movememt among imaginative artists.[/b]

Originally posted by sonhouse
Are you normally this thickheaded? The science of archaeology is based on evidence for sure.

When they say 'possible' it is because the fossil record is very hard to come by and what knowledge we have of the past is very hard won I can assure you. So to say science is just guesswork is belittling the efforts of over 100 years of solid research.

Ever ...[text shortened]... have to work with what we have.

That is life in the big city, we have to live with it.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am not trying to belittle them. All I'm saying is wait until you got
the solid evidence before you declare something like this fact. You
need to take your smart pill.

Originally posted by sonhouse
There already is evidence. Do you think Neantertals are just a big lie?

Originally posted by RJHinds
The scientist haven't figured this all out yet; it is still in the hypotheses
stage.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Look and listen to it yourself if you don't believe me. After all this time
of man being reported as having descended from apes, suddenly after a
questioner asks him to put up or shut up he can not answer the question
and finally comes back accusing the questioner of misunderstanding and
admits that man is not a descendant of apes at all. Then makes up ...[text shortened]... the question because he can't give the example.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
wow, this is epic desperateness. out of all of dawkin's life's work, all you can dig up is an 11 second edited video from a creationist propaganda channel?

i think you were better off with "Do you really think I want to listen to this liar?"

Originally posted by RJHinds
Can't take the truth, huh?

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
have you watched the videos where dawkins actually presents his views yet?

Originally posted by RJHinds
No.

Except for when he would not answer the question and
started talking about how we were not descendants of apes.

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
i see. so you would prefer to continue getting your information from creationist propaganda sites rather than the sources. all fair and good. keep up the good work.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Do you really think I want to listen to this liar?